ANALISIS YURIDIS PERJANJIAN ANTARA MITRA PENJUAL (MERCHANT) DENGAN PERUSAHAAN PENYEDIA JASA TRANSPORTASI BERBASIS ONLINE (STUDI TERHADAP PERJANJIAN ANTARA APOTIK TERRY FARMA DAN PT SOLUSI TRANSPORTASI INDONESIA (GRAB INDONESIA)

Clara Apulina Ginting, T. ., Jelly Leviza -
{"title":"ANALISIS YURIDIS PERJANJIAN ANTARA MITRA PENJUAL (MERCHANT) DENGAN PERUSAHAAN PENYEDIA JASA TRANSPORTASI BERBASIS ONLINE (STUDI TERHADAP PERJANJIAN ANTARA APOTIK TERRY FARMA DAN PT SOLUSI TRANSPORTASI INDONESIA (GRAB INDONESIA)","authors":"Clara Apulina Ginting, T. ., Jelly Leviza -","doi":"10.34012/jihp.v4i3.2175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High rate of smartphone users makes Medan city has big potential for the development of online-base business especially in service application user, such as online transportation. Grab Indonesia is one of the service provider companies for online-base transportation application. Grab sees promising investment value projection in online-base application service as people in Indonesia are highly active users of social media and e- commerce. The problems in this research are whether the agreement between merchant and Grab Indonesia meet the legal construction as electronic contract refers to valid legislation, how is Grab's responsibilities on product quality and safety sold by merchant, and how is dispute settlement procedures between merchant and Grab Indonesia pursuant to agreement contract. This is a normative juridical research with analytical descriptive design that describes the research object through samples or collected data and makes general conclusion. The data are carried out from primary and secondary data, namely primary, secondary and tertiary law; obtained by library study and guided interview. The result demonstrates that agreement between merchant and Grab meet the legal construction as electronic contract refers to valid legislation. Grab's responsibilities on product quality and safety sold by merchant are fully given to the merchant as stated in the term and condition clauses and in Grab's code of conduct. Non-litigation through arbitrage is prioritized in dispute settlement procedures between merchant and Grab pursuant to agreement contract.","PeriodicalId":322379,"journal":{"name":"Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v4i3.2175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

High rate of smartphone users makes Medan city has big potential for the development of online-base business especially in service application user, such as online transportation. Grab Indonesia is one of the service provider companies for online-base transportation application. Grab sees promising investment value projection in online-base application service as people in Indonesia are highly active users of social media and e- commerce. The problems in this research are whether the agreement between merchant and Grab Indonesia meet the legal construction as electronic contract refers to valid legislation, how is Grab's responsibilities on product quality and safety sold by merchant, and how is dispute settlement procedures between merchant and Grab Indonesia pursuant to agreement contract. This is a normative juridical research with analytical descriptive design that describes the research object through samples or collected data and makes general conclusion. The data are carried out from primary and secondary data, namely primary, secondary and tertiary law; obtained by library study and guided interview. The result demonstrates that agreement between merchant and Grab meet the legal construction as electronic contract refers to valid legislation. Grab's responsibilities on product quality and safety sold by merchant are fully given to the merchant as stated in the term and condition clauses and in Grab's code of conduct. Non-litigation through arbitrage is prioritized in dispute settlement procedures between merchant and Grab pursuant to agreement contract.
分析销售伙伴(MERCHANT)与一家以在线为基础的交通服务服务公司(TERRY FARMA制药与PT transpo solutions (GRAB印度尼西亚)之间协议协议的研究)
棉兰市拥有较高的智能手机用户比例,这使得棉兰市的在线基础业务发展潜力巨大,尤其是在线交通等服务应用用户。Grab印尼是一家在线交通应用服务提供商。Grab认为在线应用服务具有良好的投资价值,因为印尼人是社交媒体和电子商务的高度活跃用户。本文研究的问题是,商家与Grab Indonesia之间的协议是否符合法律构建,因为电子合同是有效的立法,Grab对商家销售的产品质量和安全的责任如何,商家与Grab Indonesia之间根据协议合同的争议解决程序如何。这是一种具有分析描述性设计的规范性法律研究,通过样本或收集的数据来描述研究对象,并得出一般性结论。数据是从一级和二级数据中进行的,即一级、二级和三级法;通过图书馆学习和指导访谈获得。结果表明,商家与Grab之间的协议符合法律构建,因为电子合同是有效的立法。根据条款和条件条款以及Grab的行为准则,Grab对商家销售的产品质量和安全的责任完全交给了商家。根据协议合同,商户与Grab之间的纠纷解决程序优先考虑通过套利进行非诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信