Interpretácia a dotváranie kompetenčných noriem v správnom práve

Peter Molitoris
{"title":"Interpretácia a dotváranie kompetenčných noriem v správnom práve","authors":"Peter Molitoris","doi":"10.33542/vss2022-2-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study is devoted to the possibilities of shaping the competence norms of administrative law on the background of a case study of an ongoing dispute between the authorities of the prosecutor's office and the Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic. Act No. 180/2013 Coll. in Section 4(3)(b) excludes the possibility for the district office in the region's seat to review and subsequently amend or annul a municipality's decision outside the appeal procedure, even if it was issued in the course of the delegated exercise of state administration. The Ministry considers this situation undesirable and seeks to correct it by a teleological interpretation of the norm or by the derogation rule lex specialis derogat legi generali. The study concludes by noting the inappropriateness of such a solution with regard to the principle of legal certainty.","PeriodicalId":371639,"journal":{"name":"Verejná správa a spoločnosť","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verejná správa a spoločnosť","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33542/vss2022-2-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study is devoted to the possibilities of shaping the competence norms of administrative law on the background of a case study of an ongoing dispute between the authorities of the prosecutor's office and the Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic. Act No. 180/2013 Coll. in Section 4(3)(b) excludes the possibility for the district office in the region's seat to review and subsequently amend or annul a municipality's decision outside the appeal procedure, even if it was issued in the course of the delegated exercise of state administration. The Ministry considers this situation undesirable and seeks to correct it by a teleological interpretation of the norm or by the derogation rule lex specialis derogat legi generali. The study concludes by noting the inappropriateness of such a solution with regard to the principle of legal certainty.
这项研究是在对检察官办公室当局与斯洛伐克共和国运输和建设部之间正在发生的争端进行个案研究的背景下,专门探讨制定行政法权限规范的可能性。第180/2013号法案在第4(3)(b)条中,排除了区域所在地的区办事处在上诉程序之外审查并随后修改或撤销市政当局决定的可能性,即使该决定是在委托行使国家行政权力的过程中发布的。该部认为这种情况是不可取的,并试图通过对规范的目的论解释或通过特别法的克减规则来纠正这种情况。研究报告最后指出,这种解决办法在法律确定性原则方面是不适当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信