Refus transfusionnel

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL

Medecine & Droit Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.meddro.2022.09.002

François Vialla (Professeur de Droit privé et sciences criminelles, Directeur du Centre Européen d’Études et de Recherche Droit&Santé, Professeur des universités, Directeur de l’École de Droit de la Santé)

引用次数: 0

Abstract

After a twenty-year hiatus, the issue of transfusion refusal issued by Jehovah's Witnesses comes up in legal news with the decision of May 20, 2022 rendered by the Council of State. During these 20 years the rights of patients and the autonomy of the person have been considerably strengthened. Although the refusal of treatment is clearly stated in the law, the High Administrative Court nevertheless maintains its position.

查看原文本刊更多论文

拒绝输血

在中断了20年之后，耶和华见证人发布的拒绝输血问题在2022年5月20日由国务委员会作出的决定中出现在法律新闻中。在这20年中，病人的权利和人的自主权得到了相当大的加强。虽然法律中明确规定了拒绝待遇，但高等行政法院仍然维持其立场。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Medecine & Droit MEDICINE, LEGAL-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues