Collaborative Governance’s Risk Management (Case Study: Implementation of Tobacco Control Policy in Kulonprogo and Pekalongan City)

A. Murti, M. Baiquni, G. Lele
{"title":"Collaborative Governance’s Risk Management (Case Study: Implementation of Tobacco Control Policy in Kulonprogo and Pekalongan City)","authors":"A. Murti, M. Baiquni, G. Lele","doi":"10.18196/jgpp.v10i2.17304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explored collaborative governance risk management on implementing tobacco control policy in Kulonprogo Regency and Pekalongan City. The research methods used qualitative methods based on primary and secondary data. The authors collected the primary data through interviews with some actors. In contrast, the secondary data comprised online mass media and previous research on relevant topics. This article also uses the tool Nvivo12 Plus to help with data processing. The results showed that the collaborative governance of Kulonprogo Regency and Pekalongan City had some risks in their collaboration. Kulonprogo Regency could resolve those risks through decision-making to achieve the integrated mechanism. This step is easy to implicate because the actor has high cooperation to solve their problem through a joint decision. While the risk collaboration of Pekalongan city could not be solved properly cause of the lack the mechanical integration of the actor in that collaboration. The actor has different principles and impacts on a joint decision to achieve an integrated mechanism when solving the problems.","PeriodicalId":240590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Governance and Public Policy","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Governance and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v10i2.17304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explored collaborative governance risk management on implementing tobacco control policy in Kulonprogo Regency and Pekalongan City. The research methods used qualitative methods based on primary and secondary data. The authors collected the primary data through interviews with some actors. In contrast, the secondary data comprised online mass media and previous research on relevant topics. This article also uses the tool Nvivo12 Plus to help with data processing. The results showed that the collaborative governance of Kulonprogo Regency and Pekalongan City had some risks in their collaboration. Kulonprogo Regency could resolve those risks through decision-making to achieve the integrated mechanism. This step is easy to implicate because the actor has high cooperation to solve their problem through a joint decision. While the risk collaboration of Pekalongan city could not be solved properly cause of the lack the mechanical integration of the actor in that collaboration. The actor has different principles and impacts on a joint decision to achieve an integrated mechanism when solving the problems.
协同治理的风险管理(以库隆普罗戈市和贝加隆岸市控烟政策实施为例)
本文探讨了库隆普罗戈县和贝加隆岸市实施控烟政策的协同治理风险管理。研究方法采用定性方法,以一手资料和二手资料为基础。作者通过对一些演员的访谈收集了初步数据。相比之下,二手数据包括在线大众媒体和之前对相关主题的研究。本文还使用了Nvivo12 Plus工具来帮助进行数据处理。结果表明,库隆普罗戈摄政与贝加隆岸市的协同治理存在一定的风险。库仑普罗戈公司可以通过决策来化解这些风险,实现一体化机制。这个步骤很容易隐含,因为参与者通过共同决策解决问题的合作程度很高。而由于协作行为方缺乏机械一体化,致使北加隆岸市风险协作问题无法得到妥善解决。行动者在共同决策中具有不同的原则和影响,以实现解决问题的一体化机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信