When Death Comes Too Late: Radical Life Extension and the Makropulos Case

M. Hauskeller
{"title":"When Death Comes Too Late: Radical Life Extension and the Makropulos Case","authors":"M. Hauskeller","doi":"10.1017/s1358246121000278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Famously, Bernard Williams has argued that although death is an evil if it occurs when we still have something to live for, we have no good reason to desire that our lives be radically extended because any such life would at some point reach a stage when we become indifferent to the world and ourselves. This is supposed to be so bad for us that it would be better if we died before that happens. Most critics have rejected Williams’ arguments on the grounds that it is far from certain that we will run out of things to live for, and I don't contest these objections. Instead, I am trying to show that they do not affect the persuasiveness of Williams’ argument, which in my reading does not rely on the claim that we will inevitably run out of things to live for, but on the far less contentious claim that it is not unthinkable we will do so and the largely ignored claim that if that happens, we will have died too late.","PeriodicalId":269662,"journal":{"name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1358246121000278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Famously, Bernard Williams has argued that although death is an evil if it occurs when we still have something to live for, we have no good reason to desire that our lives be radically extended because any such life would at some point reach a stage when we become indifferent to the world and ourselves. This is supposed to be so bad for us that it would be better if we died before that happens. Most critics have rejected Williams’ arguments on the grounds that it is far from certain that we will run out of things to live for, and I don't contest these objections. Instead, I am trying to show that they do not affect the persuasiveness of Williams’ argument, which in my reading does not rely on the claim that we will inevitably run out of things to live for, but on the far less contentious claim that it is not unthinkable we will do so and the largely ignored claim that if that happens, we will have died too late.
当死亡来得太晚:激进的延长生命和Makropulos案例
伯纳德·威廉姆斯(Bernard Williams)有一个著名的观点,他认为,尽管死亡是一种邪恶,如果它发生在我们还有活着的理由的时候,我们没有充分的理由希望我们的生命从根本上延长,因为任何这样的生命都会在某个时候达到一个阶段,那时我们对世界和自己都变得冷漠。这对我们来说太糟糕了,如果我们在那之前死去会更好。大多数评论家都拒绝了威廉姆斯的论点,理由是我们远不能确定我们会耗尽生活的目标,我不反对这些反对意见。相反,我试图表明,它们不会影响威廉姆斯论点的说服力,在我的阅读中,威廉姆斯的论点并不依赖于我们将不可避免地耗尽生命的理由这一说法,而是依赖于一个争议小得多的说法,即我们会这样做并非不可想象,以及一个基本上被忽视的说法,即如果发生这种情况,我们就会死得太晚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信