Which software design development methodology is appropriate for engineering education

I. Rozman, J. Gyorkos, T. Welzer
{"title":"Which software design development methodology is appropriate for engineering education","authors":"I. Rozman, J. Gyorkos, T. Welzer","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1991.187572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experiment was conducted to highlight the technicality of two quite different but well known software development methodologies: System Analysis-System Design (SA-SD) and Jackson System Development (JSD). There was no attempt to reach a general conclusion about which software development methodology is better, looking from all aspects. Comparison was done by means of a questionnaire which was completed by 12 young engineers after they had finished their seminar work in postgraduate study. The results obtained speak in favor of the SA-SD methodology because it is more understandable to an engineer.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":414138,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1991.187572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to highlight the technicality of two quite different but well known software development methodologies: System Analysis-System Design (SA-SD) and Jackson System Development (JSD). There was no attempt to reach a general conclusion about which software development methodology is better, looking from all aspects. Comparison was done by means of a questionnaire which was completed by 12 young engineers after they had finished their seminar work in postgraduate study. The results obtained speak in favor of the SA-SD methodology because it is more understandable to an engineer.<>
哪种软件设计开发方法适合工程教育
进行了一个实验来强调两种完全不同但众所周知的软件开发方法的技术性:系统分析-系统设计(SA-SD)和杰克逊系统开发(JSD)。从各个方面来看,并没有试图得出关于哪种软件开发方法更好的一般结论。比较是通过问卷调查的方式进行的,问卷调查是由12名年轻的工程师在完成研究生的研讨会工作后完成的。获得的结果支持SA-SD方法,因为它对工程师来说更容易理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信