S. Kim, Jung Kyu Lee, D. Kim, Jonghwan Shin, Kijeong Hong, E. Heo
{"title":"Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Early-Onset Pneumonia in Cardiac Arrest Patients Treated with Therapeutic Hypothermia","authors":"S. Kim, Jung Kyu Lee, D. Kim, Jonghwan Shin, Kijeong Hong, E. Heo","doi":"10.4266/KJCCM.2016.31.1.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infectious complications are frequent after cardiac arrest and a few reports have demonstrated that infections may be even more frequent after therapeutic hypothermia. Pneumonia is the most frequent infectious complication in these patient. Objectives: We investigated the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on the development of pneumonia in cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who admitted for therapeutic hypothermia after resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between January 2010 and December 2011. Patients dying within the first 72 hours were excluded. Results: Of the 46 patients admitted after cardiac arrest, 31 patients were analyzed and 24 patients (77%) were treated with prophylactic antibiotics within the 24 hours. The frequency of pneumonia in the first three days (early pneumonia) and after the third day (late pneumonia) was not significantly different between the prophylactic antibiotics group and the control group(33.3% vs 11.1% for early pneumonia, P=0.639; 50% vs 18.6% for late pneumonia, P=0.412). And the antibiotic prophylaxis did not also influence the length of ICU stay (19. 4 days in the prophylactic antibiotics group vs 16.4 days in the control group, P=0.659) and of mechanical ventilator (17.3 days in the prophylactic antibiotics group vs 12.7 days in the control group, P=0.372). Conclusion: Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia did not reduce the frequency of pneumonia.","PeriodicalId":255255,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4266/KJCCM.2016.31.1.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Background: Infectious complications are frequent after cardiac arrest and a few reports have demonstrated that infections may be even more frequent after therapeutic hypothermia. Pneumonia is the most frequent infectious complication in these patient. Objectives: We investigated the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on the development of pneumonia in cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who admitted for therapeutic hypothermia after resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between January 2010 and December 2011. Patients dying within the first 72 hours were excluded. Results: Of the 46 patients admitted after cardiac arrest, 31 patients were analyzed and 24 patients (77%) were treated with prophylactic antibiotics within the 24 hours. The frequency of pneumonia in the first three days (early pneumonia) and after the third day (late pneumonia) was not significantly different between the prophylactic antibiotics group and the control group(33.3% vs 11.1% for early pneumonia, P=0.639; 50% vs 18.6% for late pneumonia, P=0.412). And the antibiotic prophylaxis did not also influence the length of ICU stay (19. 4 days in the prophylactic antibiotics group vs 16.4 days in the control group, P=0.659) and of mechanical ventilator (17.3 days in the prophylactic antibiotics group vs 12.7 days in the control group, P=0.372). Conclusion: Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia did not reduce the frequency of pneumonia.
背景:感染并发症在心脏骤停后很常见,一些报道表明,治疗性低温后感染可能更频繁。肺炎是这些患者中最常见的感染性并发症。目的:探讨抗生素预防对治疗性低温治疗的心脏骤停患者发生肺炎的影响。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2011年12月院外心脏骤停复苏后因治疗性低温入院的患者病历。在最初72小时内死亡的患者被排除在外。结果:46例心脏骤停后入院的患者中,分析31例,24小时内预防性抗生素治疗24例(77%)。预防性抗生素治疗组前3天(早期肺炎)和后3天(晚期肺炎)肺炎发生频率与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(早期肺炎33.3% vs 11.1%, P=0.639;晚期肺炎50% vs 18.6%, P=0.412)。抗生素预防也不影响ICU住院时间(19。预防性抗生素组为4天,对照组为16.4天,P=0.659);机械呼吸机组为17.3天,对照组为12.7天,P=0.372)。结论:治疗性低温治疗的心脏骤停患者抗生素预防并不能降低肺炎的发生频率。