Comparison of weight allocation in Malaysian harmonious living

Siti Farhanah Hasnan, Razamin Ramli, M. M. Kasim, M. N. A. Hamid
{"title":"Comparison of weight allocation in Malaysian harmonious living","authors":"Siti Farhanah Hasnan, Razamin Ramli, M. M. Kasim, M. N. A. Hamid","doi":"10.1063/1.5121091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Demanding of harmonious society is a challenging task in every country especially for multi-ethnicity society. Despite sharing the same homeland, they has their own heritage that reflect their ethnics. Each of the ethnic are defending their respective right. Ergo, the similarities of these diversity, particularly culture and identity should be as a nation forte to unite the society. Overall, 18 criteria was identified which are consist of 11 for national culture and 7 for national identity. Thus, the aims of this paper is a comparative analysis on weighting allocation in determining the importance of these criteria that contribute towards Malaysian harmonious living. In order to identify relevant important criteria, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach is utilized to allocate the weight for each identified criteria. The findings reveal the degree of importance of each criteria under culture and identity that could be used as a guideline for national policy maker and relevant government authorities to planning the activities specifically when it is involving the community as a whole.Demanding of harmonious society is a challenging task in every country especially for multi-ethnicity society. Despite sharing the same homeland, they has their own heritage that reflect their ethnics. Each of the ethnic are defending their respective right. Ergo, the similarities of these diversity, particularly culture and identity should be as a nation forte to unite the society. Overall, 18 criteria was identified which are consist of 11 for national culture and 7 for national identity. Thus, the aims of this paper is a comparative analysis on weighting allocation in determining the importance of these criteria that contribute towards Malaysian harmonious living. In order to identify relevant important criteria, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach is utilized to allocate the weight for each identified criteria. The findings reveal the degree of importance of each criteria under culture and identity that could be used as a guideline for national policy maker and relevant government authoriti...","PeriodicalId":325925,"journal":{"name":"THE 4TH INNOVATION AND ANALYTICS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (IACE 2019)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE 4TH INNOVATION AND ANALYTICS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (IACE 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5121091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Demanding of harmonious society is a challenging task in every country especially for multi-ethnicity society. Despite sharing the same homeland, they has their own heritage that reflect their ethnics. Each of the ethnic are defending their respective right. Ergo, the similarities of these diversity, particularly culture and identity should be as a nation forte to unite the society. Overall, 18 criteria was identified which are consist of 11 for national culture and 7 for national identity. Thus, the aims of this paper is a comparative analysis on weighting allocation in determining the importance of these criteria that contribute towards Malaysian harmonious living. In order to identify relevant important criteria, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach is utilized to allocate the weight for each identified criteria. The findings reveal the degree of importance of each criteria under culture and identity that could be used as a guideline for national policy maker and relevant government authorities to planning the activities specifically when it is involving the community as a whole.Demanding of harmonious society is a challenging task in every country especially for multi-ethnicity society. Despite sharing the same homeland, they has their own heritage that reflect their ethnics. Each of the ethnic are defending their respective right. Ergo, the similarities of these diversity, particularly culture and identity should be as a nation forte to unite the society. Overall, 18 criteria was identified which are consist of 11 for national culture and 7 for national identity. Thus, the aims of this paper is a comparative analysis on weighting allocation in determining the importance of these criteria that contribute towards Malaysian harmonious living. In order to identify relevant important criteria, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach is utilized to allocate the weight for each identified criteria. The findings reveal the degree of importance of each criteria under culture and identity that could be used as a guideline for national policy maker and relevant government authoriti...
马来西亚和谐生活中的体重分配比较
构建和谐社会是每个国家都面临的艰巨任务,对于多民族社会更是如此。尽管他们生活在同一个家园,但他们有自己的遗产,反映了他们的种族。每个民族都在捍卫自己的权利。因此,这些多样性的相似性,特别是文化和认同应该作为一个国家团结社会的力量。总共确定了18项标准,其中11项是民族文化,7项是民族认同。因此,本文的目的是对权重分配进行比较分析,以确定有助于马来西亚和谐生活的这些标准的重要性。为了确定相关的重要标准,采用多准则决策方法对每个确定的标准分配权重。调查结果揭示了文化和身份下每个标准的重要性程度,可以作为国家决策者和有关政府当局在涉及整个社区时具体规划活动的指导方针。构建和谐社会是每个国家都面临的艰巨任务,对于多民族社会更是如此。尽管他们生活在同一个家园,但他们有自己的遗产,反映了他们的种族。每个民族都在捍卫自己的权利。因此,这些多样性的相似性,特别是文化和认同应该作为一个国家团结社会的力量。总共确定了18项标准,其中11项是民族文化,7项是民族认同。因此,本文的目的是对权重分配进行比较分析,以确定有助于马来西亚和谐生活的这些标准的重要性。为了确定相关的重要标准,采用多准则决策方法对每个确定的标准分配权重。研究结果揭示了文化和身份下每个标准的重要性程度,可以作为国家政策制定者和相关政府当局的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信