The Reflective Abilities of Schoolchildren

G. Zuckerman
{"title":"The Reflective Abilities of Schoolchildren","authors":"G. Zuckerman","doi":"10.1080/10610405.2021.2034724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question asked here is not a rhetorical reference to what we have said up to now. The choice of goals and, accordingly, methods of elementary instruction depends on how it is answered. We have only formulated one possible answer: not knowing what one does not know, it is impossible to set targets for self-education, to teach oneself, to be the subject of one’s own learning activity. But there is another possible answer: not knowing what one does not know can be an excellent topic for study, prompting one to avidly absorb any knowledge, abilities, and skills. Children can be taught to read, write, and count perfectly; they can even be made into experts, highly qualified specialists who can solve any problem within the bounds of their competence. But is it possible, without knowing the limits of one’s competence, to go beyond these limits and set fundamentally new tasks, without waiting for “life itself” (in the person of a teacher, boss, or leader) to prod one? We have no wish to engage in unproductive, purely confessional debate about which school is better: one that nurtures the subjects of instruction, or one that looks at the child as the object of its tender pedagogical concerns. Both approaches to the instruction of primary schoolchildren are acceptable, but they are incompatible, and the main thing is not to confuse them: not to impute to a school oriented toward the training of specialists and technicians, the cultivation of learning to learn, which it cannot attain; and not to judge a school that cultivates learning to learn, only by the skillful achievements of its students. And each school should proceed according to its internal laws, not applying alien and even harmful approaches from a different educational system. For example, for knowledgeable adults who invest their knowledge in children’s minds (“the reasonable, the good, the eternal”), academic discussion about learning is not useful: there should be one truth, clear and not corroded by doubt. But teachers who encourage students to learn on their own simply cannot do","PeriodicalId":308330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2021.2034724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question asked here is not a rhetorical reference to what we have said up to now. The choice of goals and, accordingly, methods of elementary instruction depends on how it is answered. We have only formulated one possible answer: not knowing what one does not know, it is impossible to set targets for self-education, to teach oneself, to be the subject of one’s own learning activity. But there is another possible answer: not knowing what one does not know can be an excellent topic for study, prompting one to avidly absorb any knowledge, abilities, and skills. Children can be taught to read, write, and count perfectly; they can even be made into experts, highly qualified specialists who can solve any problem within the bounds of their competence. But is it possible, without knowing the limits of one’s competence, to go beyond these limits and set fundamentally new tasks, without waiting for “life itself” (in the person of a teacher, boss, or leader) to prod one? We have no wish to engage in unproductive, purely confessional debate about which school is better: one that nurtures the subjects of instruction, or one that looks at the child as the object of its tender pedagogical concerns. Both approaches to the instruction of primary schoolchildren are acceptable, but they are incompatible, and the main thing is not to confuse them: not to impute to a school oriented toward the training of specialists and technicians, the cultivation of learning to learn, which it cannot attain; and not to judge a school that cultivates learning to learn, only by the skillful achievements of its students. And each school should proceed according to its internal laws, not applying alien and even harmful approaches from a different educational system. For example, for knowledgeable adults who invest their knowledge in children’s minds (“the reasonable, the good, the eternal”), academic discussion about learning is not useful: there should be one truth, clear and not corroded by doubt. But teachers who encourage students to learn on their own simply cannot do
学童的反思能力
这里提出的问题并不是反问我们到目前为止所说的话。目标的选择,以及相应的基础教学方法的选择,取决于如何回答这个问题。我们只提出了一个可能的答案:不知道自己不知道的东西,就不可能设定自我教育的目标,不可能自学,不可能成为自己学习活动的主体。但还有另一种可能的答案:不知道自己不知道的东西可以成为一个很好的学习主题,促使一个人贪婪地吸收任何知识、能力和技能。孩子们可以被教得很好地阅读、写作和计算;他们甚至可以成为专家,能够在他们的能力范围内解决任何问题的高素质专家。但是,在不知道自己能力的极限的情况下,不等待“生活本身”(老师、老板或领导)的激励,就超越这些极限,设定全新的任务,这有可能吗?我们不希望参与一场毫无意义的、纯粹自白的辩论,讨论哪所学校更好:是培养教学对象的学校,还是将孩子视为其温柔教学关注的对象的学校。这两种教育小学生的方法都是可以接受的,但它们是不相容的,最重要的是不要把它们混淆:不要把一所以培养专家和技术人员为导向的学校,归咎于它无法做到的学会学习的培养;而不去评判一所培养学习能力的学校,只看学生的熟练成绩。每一所学校都应该根据其内部法律行事,而不是采用来自不同教育制度的外来甚至有害的方法。例如,对于那些把自己的知识灌输给孩子们的成年人(“合理的、好的、永恒的”)来说,关于学习的学术讨论是没有用的:应该有一个真理,清晰而不被怀疑所腐蚀。但是那些鼓励学生自主学习的老师根本做不到这一点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信