Should I Use ACI 318 or LRFD for Designing Composite Columns?

R. Furlong
{"title":"Should I Use ACI 318 or LRFD for Designing Composite Columns?","authors":"R. Furlong","doi":"10.14359/10001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Steel-concrete composite columns may be designed either by requirements of the American Concrete Institute Building Code ACI 318-99 or by the American Institute of Steel Construction Specifications for Load and Resistance Factor Design, 2nd Edition (1995). Each design standard is described for application to a concrete filled steel tube and to a concrete encased structural shape as each is designed for the same dimensional and service load conditions. These \"standard\" type column sections are used for the comparison, as the LRFD specification can be used directly only for such standard sections. The design exercise demonstrates that (a) the LRFD specification requires fewer computational steps and is therefore easier to apply, (b) the ACI rules tend to exaggerate the influence of slenderness, and (c) different but very similar results were obtained for the two methods applied to the same design problem.","PeriodicalId":282353,"journal":{"name":"SP-196: Composite and Hybrid Systems","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SP-196: Composite and Hybrid Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14359/10001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Steel-concrete composite columns may be designed either by requirements of the American Concrete Institute Building Code ACI 318-99 or by the American Institute of Steel Construction Specifications for Load and Resistance Factor Design, 2nd Edition (1995). Each design standard is described for application to a concrete filled steel tube and to a concrete encased structural shape as each is designed for the same dimensional and service load conditions. These "standard" type column sections are used for the comparison, as the LRFD specification can be used directly only for such standard sections. The design exercise demonstrates that (a) the LRFD specification requires fewer computational steps and is therefore easier to apply, (b) the ACI rules tend to exaggerate the influence of slenderness, and (c) different but very similar results were obtained for the two methods applied to the same design problem.
我应该使用ACI 318或LRFD设计复合列吗?
钢-混凝土组合柱可以根据美国混凝土协会建筑规范ACI 318-99或美国钢结构协会荷载和阻力因素设计规范第二版(1995)的要求进行设计。每一种设计标准都适用于钢管混凝土和混凝土外壳结构,因为每一种设计标准都是为相同的尺寸和使用荷载条件而设计的。这些“标准”类型的列截面用于比较,因为LRFD规范只能直接用于这些标准截面。设计实践表明:(a) LRFD规范需要较少的计算步骤,因此更容易应用,(b) ACI规则倾向于夸大长细度的影响,以及(c)应用于相同设计问题的两种方法获得了不同但非常相似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信