A unified framework for software engineering process improvement — A taxonomy comparative analysis

Aedah Abd Rahman, S. Sahibuddin, S. Ibrahim
{"title":"A unified framework for software engineering process improvement — A taxonomy comparative analysis","authors":"Aedah Abd Rahman, S. Sahibuddin, S. Ibrahim","doi":"10.1109/MYSEC.2011.6140661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concurrent adoption of software engineering process improvement frameworks have been widely practiced by the software organizations. The software development organizations leverage these frameworks to better address process improvement challenges. This paper develops an integrated framework for software engineering process improvement practices and unifies the theories in process definition and establishment. The unified framework provides a set of formal descriptions for software engineering process improvement frameworks. Requirements and architectures for software engineering process improvement frameworks are investigated. The main challenge in the integration is the interoperability of the frameworks. Inaccurate integration approach results in inefficiency of the integration process. Common interoperability issues in the integration of current process models and methodologies are addressed. In addition to this, omissions, differences and gaps can be identified and further examined for development of new unified framework. Taxonomy for software engineering process framework is used to support the understanding and comparison of diverse software quality frameworks. The taxonomy should be based on discipline-specific framework. Besides, other alternative approaches for comparing the software engineering process improvement framework are presented. The research outcome is expected to identify the structural relationships among the frameworks. Derivation from the taxonomy includes characteristics and categories of attributes tailored to the discipline-specific framework.","PeriodicalId":137714,"journal":{"name":"2011 Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MYSEC.2011.6140661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Concurrent adoption of software engineering process improvement frameworks have been widely practiced by the software organizations. The software development organizations leverage these frameworks to better address process improvement challenges. This paper develops an integrated framework for software engineering process improvement practices and unifies the theories in process definition and establishment. The unified framework provides a set of formal descriptions for software engineering process improvement frameworks. Requirements and architectures for software engineering process improvement frameworks are investigated. The main challenge in the integration is the interoperability of the frameworks. Inaccurate integration approach results in inefficiency of the integration process. Common interoperability issues in the integration of current process models and methodologies are addressed. In addition to this, omissions, differences and gaps can be identified and further examined for development of new unified framework. Taxonomy for software engineering process framework is used to support the understanding and comparison of diverse software quality frameworks. The taxonomy should be based on discipline-specific framework. Besides, other alternative approaches for comparing the software engineering process improvement framework are presented. The research outcome is expected to identify the structural relationships among the frameworks. Derivation from the taxonomy includes characteristics and categories of attributes tailored to the discipline-specific framework.
软件工程过程改进的统一框架——分类比较分析
软件工程过程改进框架的并行采用已经被软件组织广泛实践。软件开发组织利用这些框架来更好地处理过程改进的挑战。本文开发了一个软件工程过程改进实践的集成框架,并统一了过程定义和过程建立方面的理论。统一框架为软件工程过程改进框架提供了一套形式化的描述。研究了软件工程过程改进框架的需求和体系结构。集成中的主要挑战是框架的互操作性。不准确的集成方法导致了集成过程的低效率。讨论了当前流程模型和方法集成中的常见互操作性问题。除此之外,还可以确定和进一步审查遗漏、差异和差距,以便制定新的统一框架。软件工程过程框架分类法用于支持对不同软件质量框架的理解和比较。分类法应该基于特定学科的框架。此外,还提出了比较软件工程过程改进框架的其他替代方法。研究结果有望确定框架之间的结构关系。分类法的派生包括针对特定于学科的框架定制的属性的特征和类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信