A Framework for Demand-Side Management With Demand Response Input

Miguel A. Peinado-Guerrero, Nicolas A. Campbell, J. Villalobos, P. Phelan
{"title":"A Framework for Demand-Side Management With Demand Response Input","authors":"Miguel A. Peinado-Guerrero, Nicolas A. Campbell, J. Villalobos, P. Phelan","doi":"10.1115/power2020-16635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A framework is proposed for demand-side load management (DSLM) of manufacturers participating in demand response (DR) programs. Utilities are increasingly focused on enticing their portfolios of energy end-users to adjust their energy use patterns in a mutually beneficial manner such as with DR programs. DR programs allow the utility to receive bulk peak load reduction and the participating end-user to receive credit towards their electricity bills. Once an end-user is enrolled in a DR program, they receive periodic requests for some amount of load reduction, typically the day before. Failing to respond to a DR signal will usually cost the end-user handsomely. The end-user is often left to their own discretion on how to attain the level of load reduction requested by the utility. For a manufacturer, this means if the request in load reduction is high enough, they will need to figure out how to curtail production. On the other hand, if the load reduction requested is small enough to need no disruption to production, the utility may be missing out on untapped DR capabilities that could be offered from the ability of the manufacturer to reschedule their production. In either case, the availability of an optimal plan for the manufacturer to best schedule its production in response to a DR event can maximize the benefits for both parties. Most of the research found in literature addresses production scheduling with minimal energy use or cost with respect to a time-of-use price tariff. A system that communicates the desires of the utility to the end-user for a DR event and provides the end-user with support in the decision-making process remains to be developed. The framework proposed addresses these shortcomings, considering the introduction of IoT capabilities and the physical constraints of the manufacturer.","PeriodicalId":282703,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2020 Power Conference","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2020 Power Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/power2020-16635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A framework is proposed for demand-side load management (DSLM) of manufacturers participating in demand response (DR) programs. Utilities are increasingly focused on enticing their portfolios of energy end-users to adjust their energy use patterns in a mutually beneficial manner such as with DR programs. DR programs allow the utility to receive bulk peak load reduction and the participating end-user to receive credit towards their electricity bills. Once an end-user is enrolled in a DR program, they receive periodic requests for some amount of load reduction, typically the day before. Failing to respond to a DR signal will usually cost the end-user handsomely. The end-user is often left to their own discretion on how to attain the level of load reduction requested by the utility. For a manufacturer, this means if the request in load reduction is high enough, they will need to figure out how to curtail production. On the other hand, if the load reduction requested is small enough to need no disruption to production, the utility may be missing out on untapped DR capabilities that could be offered from the ability of the manufacturer to reschedule their production. In either case, the availability of an optimal plan for the manufacturer to best schedule its production in response to a DR event can maximize the benefits for both parties. Most of the research found in literature addresses production scheduling with minimal energy use or cost with respect to a time-of-use price tariff. A system that communicates the desires of the utility to the end-user for a DR event and provides the end-user with support in the decision-making process remains to be developed. The framework proposed addresses these shortcomings, considering the introduction of IoT capabilities and the physical constraints of the manufacturer.
基于需求响应输入的需求侧管理框架
提出了参与需求响应(DR)计划的制造商的需求侧负荷管理框架。公用事业公司越来越注重吸引其能源终端用户以互利的方式调整其能源使用模式,例如DR计划。DR计划允许公用事业公司获得大量峰值负荷减少,参与的最终用户获得电费抵免。一旦最终用户注册了DR程序,他们就会定期收到一定数量的负载减少请求,通常是在前一天。不响应DR信号通常会让终端用户付出巨大的代价。最终用户通常可以自行决定如何达到公用事业公司所要求的负荷降低水平。对于制造商来说,这意味着如果减少负载的要求足够高,他们将需要弄清楚如何减少生产。另一方面,如果请求的负载减少足够小,不需要中断生产,那么公用事业公司可能会错过未开发的DR功能,这些功能可以从制造商重新安排生产的能力中提供。在任何一种情况下,对于制造商来说,最优计划的可用性可以最大限度地提高双方的利益,从而对DR事件做出最佳的生产调度。在文献中发现的大多数研究都涉及与使用时间价格关税相关的最小能源使用或成本的生产调度。在灾难恢复事件中,向最终用户传达公用事业公司的愿望,并在决策过程中为最终用户提供支持的系统仍有待开发。考虑到物联网功能的引入和制造商的物理限制,提出的框架解决了这些缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信