{"title":"PIERCING THE VEIL – A DODO OF A DOCTRINE?","authors":"A. Alcock","doi":"10.5750/DLJ.V25I1.785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the course of the 2012/13 legal year, the Supreme Court has had to consider the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil twice, in VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corpn (VTB), and more recently in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd (Prest). On both occasions, the Court was in effect asked to remove the whole doctrine from English Law, but narrowly failed to do so, begging the question, does the doctrine really serve any purpose now? Let me start with Prest .","PeriodicalId":382436,"journal":{"name":"The Denning Law Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Denning Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/DLJ.V25I1.785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the course of the 2012/13 legal year, the Supreme Court has had to consider the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil twice, in VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corpn (VTB), and more recently in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd (Prest). On both occasions, the Court was in effect asked to remove the whole doctrine from English Law, but narrowly failed to do so, begging the question, does the doctrine really serve any purpose now? Let me start with Prest .
在2012/13法律年度期间,最高法院不得不考虑两次穿透公司面纱的原则,VTB Capital plc诉Nutritek International corp (VTB)案,以及最近的Prest诉Petrodel Resources Ltd (Prest)案。在这两种情况下,法院实际上都被要求从英国法中删除整个原则,但勉强没有这样做,这就引出了一个问题,这个原则现在真的有用吗?让我从普雷斯特开始。