PENGARUH SKEPTISISME PROFESIONAL DAN KEAHLIAN AUDIT TERHADAP KUALITAS HASIL AUDIT (STUDI PADA INSPEKTORAT ACEH)

Surna Lastri, Fitri Yunina, M. P. Utama
{"title":"PENGARUH SKEPTISISME PROFESIONAL DAN KEAHLIAN AUDIT TERHADAP KUALITAS HASIL AUDIT (STUDI PADA INSPEKTORAT ACEH)","authors":"Surna Lastri, Fitri Yunina, M. P. Utama","doi":"10.24123/jati.v15i2.4915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study examines the effect of professional skepticism and audit expertise on the quality of audit results at the Aceh Inspectorate. Collecting data using a structured questionnaire with a Likert scale. A total of 53 questionnaires were distributed to all auditors at the Aceh Inspectorate. Saturation sampling was used to determine the research sample. The data analysis technique uses multiple linear regression analysis (multiple linear regression). The result shows that professional skepticism and audit expertise have effects on the quality of audit results at the Aceh Inspectorate. Professional skepticism has a positive effect on the quality of audit results, professional skepticism reduces the level of auditor error in conducting audits. Furthermore, audit expertise has a positive effect on the quality of audit results. This research is only limited in scope, especially limitations in sampling and research objects. Limitations need to be considered in further research, namely a more representative research method approach such as taking samples from various parties. Furthermore, this research contributes to the model of testing the quality of audit results through the relationship of professional skepticism and audit expertise with the quality of audit results, while also expanding the discussion on strategies for obtaining quality audit reports at the Aceh Inspectorate.","PeriodicalId":375951,"journal":{"name":"Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24123/jati.v15i2.4915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study examines the effect of professional skepticism and audit expertise on the quality of audit results at the Aceh Inspectorate. Collecting data using a structured questionnaire with a Likert scale. A total of 53 questionnaires were distributed to all auditors at the Aceh Inspectorate. Saturation sampling was used to determine the research sample. The data analysis technique uses multiple linear regression analysis (multiple linear regression). The result shows that professional skepticism and audit expertise have effects on the quality of audit results at the Aceh Inspectorate. Professional skepticism has a positive effect on the quality of audit results, professional skepticism reduces the level of auditor error in conducting audits. Furthermore, audit expertise has a positive effect on the quality of audit results. This research is only limited in scope, especially limitations in sampling and research objects. Limitations need to be considered in further research, namely a more representative research method approach such as taking samples from various parties. Furthermore, this research contributes to the model of testing the quality of audit results through the relationship of professional skepticism and audit expertise with the quality of audit results, while also expanding the discussion on strategies for obtaining quality audit reports at the Aceh Inspectorate.
专业怀疑和审计专业技能对审计结果质量的影响
本研究的目的是考察专业怀疑主义和审计专业知识对亚齐监察局审计结果质量的影响。使用李克特量表的结构化问卷收集数据。共向亚齐监察局的所有审计员分发了53份调查表。采用饱和取样法确定研究样品。数据分析技术采用多元线性回归分析(multiple linear regression)。结果表明,专业怀疑和审计专业知识对亚齐督察审计结果的质量有影响。职业怀疑对审计结果的质量有积极的影响,职业怀疑降低了审计师在进行审计时的错误程度。此外,审计专业知识对审计结果的质量有积极的影响。本研究的范围有限,尤其是样本和研究对象的限制。在进一步的研究中需要考虑局限性,即更有代表性的研究方法,如从各方取样。此外,本研究有助于通过专业怀疑主义和审计专业知识与审计结果质量的关系来检验审计结果质量的模型,同时也扩大了对亚齐监察局获得质量审计报告的策略的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信