Cyanoacrylate glue using the VenaSeal™ Closure System for varicose veins may not be the panacea endovenous ablation device-more complications than you think

C. Keohane, Walsh, A. Tiwari, Davies Ah, Tang Ty
{"title":"Cyanoacrylate glue using the VenaSeal™ Closure System for varicose veins may not be the panacea endovenous ablation device-more complications than you think","authors":"C. Keohane, Walsh, A. Tiwari, Davies Ah, Tang Ty","doi":"10.15761/VDT.1000184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radiofrequency and endovenous laser ablation (RFA/EVLA) are two of the most popular minimally invasive treatments and having come to the market earlier, they have a well-established safety record and are the current gold standard for comparison. Recent unrivalled 15-year follow-up data using RFA have shown excellent durable longterm technical success [1]. However, there are still significant adverse events and the concerns of skin burns and endovenous heat induced thrombosis (EHIT) (3-5%) [2,3] are unique to these thermal techniques.","PeriodicalId":206117,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Diseases and Therapeutics","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Diseases and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/VDT.1000184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiofrequency and endovenous laser ablation (RFA/EVLA) are two of the most popular minimally invasive treatments and having come to the market earlier, they have a well-established safety record and are the current gold standard for comparison. Recent unrivalled 15-year follow-up data using RFA have shown excellent durable longterm technical success [1]. However, there are still significant adverse events and the concerns of skin burns and endovenous heat induced thrombosis (EHIT) (3-5%) [2,3] are unique to these thermal techniques.
使用氰基丙烯酸酯胶的VenaSeal™静脉曲张封闭系统可能不是万能的静脉内消融装置-比你想象的更多的并发症
射频和静脉内激光消融(RFA/EVLA)是两种最流行的微创治疗方法,它们进入市场的时间较早,具有良好的安全记录,是目前比较的金标准。最近使用RFA的15年随访数据显示了出色的持久的长期技术成功[1]。然而,这些热技术仍然存在显著的不良事件和皮肤烧伤和静脉内热致血栓形成(EHIT)(3-5%)的担忧[2,3]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信