Polish National Registry for Fetal Cardiac Malformations (www.orpkp.pl) and negative verifications during the 10 years

M. Respondek-Liberska
{"title":"Polish National Registry for Fetal Cardiac Malformations (www.orpkp.pl) and negative verifications during the 10 years","authors":"M. Respondek-Liberska","doi":"10.1515/pcard-2015-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Polish National Registry for Fetal Cardiac Malformations ( initiated in 2004) was opened for primary practicioners as well as for the referral centers performing or basic fetal heart evaluation or targeted fetal echocardiography. None of the physicians until current era had regular education of fetal cardiology . It was necessary to create an audit - veryfication system, which was provided as a checking each record by the 3 most experienced fetal cardiologists in Poland, using randomised computer system. The aim of this analysis was a retrospective evaluation of „Negatively Verified” Material and methods: The total number of fetuses in Registry during 2004 and 2013 was 5682 and there were 170 negative verified cases. Every „negative case” was analyzed and qualified to one of five categories: An error in classification of the severity of CHD ; computer mistakes , reported other prenatal problems but not CHD, different interpretation of the images (freezed frames or cine loops) and bad order of the labels of cardiac anomalies. Results: The percentage of negative verifications was similar every year and total number of negative verification was 2,9% . The main reason for negative was first of all unproper fetal heart classification in 71 cases (42%). In majority the differences in interpretations were minor: but there were 5 huge differences between primary and secondary interpretation. Conclusions: 1) Fetal heart cardiology requires prenatal heart classification instead of pediatric classification 2) Computer mistakes (missing fields, missing diagnoses, lack of freezed frames or cine-loops) shoud be picked up by the system during up-loading of the cases 3) The different interpretation of the images could be used for teaching purpose of fetal cardiology .","PeriodicalId":415760,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Cardiology","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pcard-2015-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Polish National Registry for Fetal Cardiac Malformations ( initiated in 2004) was opened for primary practicioners as well as for the referral centers performing or basic fetal heart evaluation or targeted fetal echocardiography. None of the physicians until current era had regular education of fetal cardiology . It was necessary to create an audit - veryfication system, which was provided as a checking each record by the 3 most experienced fetal cardiologists in Poland, using randomised computer system. The aim of this analysis was a retrospective evaluation of „Negatively Verified” Material and methods: The total number of fetuses in Registry during 2004 and 2013 was 5682 and there were 170 negative verified cases. Every „negative case” was analyzed and qualified to one of five categories: An error in classification of the severity of CHD ; computer mistakes , reported other prenatal problems but not CHD, different interpretation of the images (freezed frames or cine loops) and bad order of the labels of cardiac anomalies. Results: The percentage of negative verifications was similar every year and total number of negative verification was 2,9% . The main reason for negative was first of all unproper fetal heart classification in 71 cases (42%). In majority the differences in interpretations were minor: but there were 5 huge differences between primary and secondary interpretation. Conclusions: 1) Fetal heart cardiology requires prenatal heart classification instead of pediatric classification 2) Computer mistakes (missing fields, missing diagnoses, lack of freezed frames or cine-loops) shoud be picked up by the system during up-loading of the cases 3) The different interpretation of the images could be used for teaching purpose of fetal cardiology .
波兰国家胎儿心脏畸形登记处(www.orpkp.pl)和10年来的负面验证
波兰国家胎儿心脏畸形登记处(2004年启动)是开放给初级医生以及转诊中心执行或基本的胎儿心脏评估或目标胎儿超声心动图。直到现在,医生都没有接受过正规的胎心学教育。有必要建立一个审核系统,由波兰最有经验的3名胎儿心脏病专家使用随机计算机系统提供每个记录的检查。本分析的目的是回顾性评价“阴性验证”材料和方法:2004年至2013年登记的胎儿总数为5682例,阴性验证病例为170例。对每个“阴性病例”进行分析,并将其定性为以下五类之一:冠心病严重程度分类错误;计算机错误,报告的其他产前问题但没有冠心病,对图像的不同解释(冻结帧或电影循环)以及心脏异常标签的顺序不当。结果:每年的拒签率基本一致,拒签总数为2.9%。71例(42%)胎儿心脏分型不正确是导致阴性的主要原因。在大多数情况下,口译差异很小,但在一次口译和二次口译之间存在5个巨大差异。结论:1)胎儿心脏学需要产前心脏分类,而不是儿科心脏分类;2)系统在病例上传过程中应及时发现计算机错误(缺失字段、漏诊、缺少定格或电影循环);3)对图像的不同解读可用于胎儿心脏学的教学目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信