Comparison of two syphilis antibody assays based on cardiolipin antigen.

NIPH annals Pub Date : 1991-06-01
P A Jenum, T Ott
{"title":"Comparison of two syphilis antibody assays based on cardiolipin antigen.","authors":"P A Jenum,&nbsp;T Ott","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two different antisyphilis screening tests based on cardiolipin antigen, the VDRL test and an RPR test (Sysmic, Diagast), were compared. A total of 2155 sera were examined by both tests. Positive results were confirmed with TPHA and TPI tests. RPR Sysmic test was as sensitive and specific as the VDRL. However, the RPR Sysmic test was easier and quicker, especially when the number of sera tested was high.</p>","PeriodicalId":76239,"journal":{"name":"NIPH annals","volume":"14 1","pages":"3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIPH annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two different antisyphilis screening tests based on cardiolipin antigen, the VDRL test and an RPR test (Sysmic, Diagast), were compared. A total of 2155 sera were examined by both tests. Positive results were confirmed with TPHA and TPI tests. RPR Sysmic test was as sensitive and specific as the VDRL. However, the RPR Sysmic test was easier and quicker, especially when the number of sera tested was high.

心磷脂抗原法测定两种梅毒抗体的比较。
比较了两种不同的基于心磷脂抗原的抗梅毒筛查试验,VDRL试验和RPR试验(Sysmic, Diagast)。两种方法共检测了2155份血清。TPHA和TPI试验结果均为阳性。RPR系统试验具有与VDRL相同的敏感性和特异性。然而,RPR系统测试更容易和快速,特别是当测试的血清数量高时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信