Accuracy and Precision of Bone Scan, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Digital Radiography in Limb Salvage Surgery for Long Bone Tumors

Gomadam Kuppusamy Rangarajan, R. Krishnakumar, D. Devadhas, M. Karthigaiselvi, K. Chandrakumar, A. Raja
{"title":"Accuracy and Precision of Bone Scan, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Digital Radiography in Limb Salvage Surgery for Long Bone Tumors","authors":"Gomadam Kuppusamy Rangarajan, R. Krishnakumar, D. Devadhas, M. Karthigaiselvi, K. Chandrakumar, A. Raja","doi":"10.37256/bsr.1120232259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the level of accuracy and precision of bone scan (BS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital radiography (DR) to measure long bone tumors to design custom made prosthesis (CMP)/modular prosthesis (MP) in limb salvage surgery (LSS). Material and methods: There are two separate groups, one is phantom study and another one is patient’s study. Phantom study: done with Jaszack phantom for gamma camera (GC) and indigenous phantom for MRI and DR. Three independent imaging professionals (nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists) measured the distance between standardized, preselected points on the Jaszack phantom in the GC and indigenous phantom on the coronal and sagittal view of the MRI scan and in DR. The measured values were compared it with the known values for phantom measurement. Patient’s study: Patients with a malignant bone tumor of the lower/upper limbs enrolled from 2020-2021 at the institute were taken up for the retrospective study. Totally 36 patients were enrolled, 24 patients were male (Ages: 2 to 45 years) and 12 patients were female (Ages: 8 to 18 years). Three independent imaging professionals measured the patient’s long bone in the BS, MRI and DR and compared with histopathological specimen measurement after LSS. Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics using appropriate measures of central tendency, dispersion, Karl-Pearson correlation coefficient and paired t-test were employed. Results: A near perfect positive correlation was evident between all three pairs of the BS, MRI scan and DR values and a positive agreement within 1 mm was around 95%. Conclusion: For the phantom study, we conclude that GC and MRI measurements are equal in physical measurements and multiplication correction factor (MCF) = 1. DR measurements were found to be near equal physical measurements and MCF = 0.9104 and three observer’s measurements values were also near normal.","PeriodicalId":298847,"journal":{"name":"Biostatistics Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biostatistics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37256/bsr.1120232259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the level of accuracy and precision of bone scan (BS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital radiography (DR) to measure long bone tumors to design custom made prosthesis (CMP)/modular prosthesis (MP) in limb salvage surgery (LSS). Material and methods: There are two separate groups, one is phantom study and another one is patient’s study. Phantom study: done with Jaszack phantom for gamma camera (GC) and indigenous phantom for MRI and DR. Three independent imaging professionals (nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists) measured the distance between standardized, preselected points on the Jaszack phantom in the GC and indigenous phantom on the coronal and sagittal view of the MRI scan and in DR. The measured values were compared it with the known values for phantom measurement. Patient’s study: Patients with a malignant bone tumor of the lower/upper limbs enrolled from 2020-2021 at the institute were taken up for the retrospective study. Totally 36 patients were enrolled, 24 patients were male (Ages: 2 to 45 years) and 12 patients were female (Ages: 8 to 18 years). Three independent imaging professionals measured the patient’s long bone in the BS, MRI and DR and compared with histopathological specimen measurement after LSS. Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics using appropriate measures of central tendency, dispersion, Karl-Pearson correlation coefficient and paired t-test were employed. Results: A near perfect positive correlation was evident between all three pairs of the BS, MRI scan and DR values and a positive agreement within 1 mm was around 95%. Conclusion: For the phantom study, we conclude that GC and MRI measurements are equal in physical measurements and multiplication correction factor (MCF) = 1. DR measurements were found to be near equal physical measurements and MCF = 0.9104 and three observer’s measurements values were also near normal.
骨扫描、磁共振成像(MRI)和数字x线摄影在长骨肿瘤保肢手术中的准确性和精密度
前言:本研究的目的是评估骨扫描(BS)、磁共振成像(MRI)和数字x线摄影(DR)测量长骨肿瘤的准确度和精密度水平,以设计残肢保留手术(LSS)中定制假体(CMP)/模块化假体(MP)。材料和方法:分为两组,一组为幻体研究,另一组为患者研究。幻影研究:使用Jaszack幻影用于伽马相机(GC)和原生幻影用于MRI和dr。三名独立的成像专业人员(核医学医师和放射科医师)测量了GC中Jaszack幻影和原生幻影在MRI扫描和dr的冠状和矢状视图上的标准化,预选点之间的距离。测量值与已知的幻影测量值进行比较。患者研究:选取2020-2021年在该研究所登记的下肢/上肢恶性骨肿瘤患者进行回顾性研究。共纳入36例患者,其中男性24例(2 ~ 45岁),女性12例(8 ~ 18岁)。由3名独立影像专业人员分别对患者的BS、MRI、DR进行长骨测量,并与LSS后的组织病理标本测量结果进行比较。统计分析:采用描述性统计方法,采用集中趋势、离散度、卡尔-皮尔逊相关系数和配对t检验。结果:三对BS、MRI扫描和DR值之间有接近完美的正相关,在1 mm内的正一致性约为95%。结论:对于幻体研究,我们得出GC和MRI测量在物理测量上是相等的,乘法校正因子(MCF) = 1。发现DR测量值接近相等的物理测量值,MCF = 0.9104,三个观测者的测量值也接近正常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信