Needle in the Haystack: Analyzing the Right of Access According to GDPR Article 15 Five Years after the Implementation

Daniela Pöhn, Niklas Mörsdorf, Wolfgang Hommel
{"title":"Needle in the Haystack: Analyzing the Right of Access According to GDPR Article 15 Five Years after the Implementation","authors":"Daniela Pöhn, Niklas Mörsdorf, Wolfgang Hommel","doi":"10.1145/3600160.3605064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) was implemented in 2018 to strengthen and harmonize the data protection of individuals within the European Union. One key aspect is Article 15, which gives individuals the right to access their personal data in an understandable format. Organizations offering services to Europeans had five years’ time to optimize their processes and functions to comply with Article 15. This study aims to explore the process of submitting and receiving the responses of organizations to GDPR Article 15 requests. A quantitative analysis obtains data from various websites to understand the level of conformity, the data received, and the challenges faced by individuals who request their data. The study differentiates organizations operating worldwide and in Germany, browser website- and app-based usage, and different types of websites. Thereby, we conclude that some websites still compile the data manually, resulting in longer waiting times. A few exceptions did not respond with any data or deliver machine-readable data (GDRP Article 20). The findings of the study additionally reveal ten patterns individuals face when requesting and accessing their data.","PeriodicalId":107145,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3600160.3605064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) was implemented in 2018 to strengthen and harmonize the data protection of individuals within the European Union. One key aspect is Article 15, which gives individuals the right to access their personal data in an understandable format. Organizations offering services to Europeans had five years’ time to optimize their processes and functions to comply with Article 15. This study aims to explore the process of submitting and receiving the responses of organizations to GDPR Article 15 requests. A quantitative analysis obtains data from various websites to understand the level of conformity, the data received, and the challenges faced by individuals who request their data. The study differentiates organizations operating worldwide and in Germany, browser website- and app-based usage, and different types of websites. Thereby, we conclude that some websites still compile the data manually, resulting in longer waiting times. A few exceptions did not respond with any data or deliver machine-readable data (GDRP Article 20). The findings of the study additionally reveal ten patterns individuals face when requesting and accessing their data.
大海捞针:根据GDPR第15条分析实施五年后的访问权
《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)于2018年实施,旨在加强和协调欧盟内部个人的数据保护。一个关键方面是第15条,它赋予个人以可理解的格式访问其个人数据的权利。为欧洲人提供服务的组织有五年的时间来优化其流程和功能,以符合第15条。本研究旨在探讨提交和接收组织对GDPR第15条请求的响应的过程。定量分析从各个网站获取数据,以了解一致性水平、收到的数据以及请求数据的个人所面临的挑战。该研究区分了在全球和德国运营的组织,基于浏览器网站和应用程序的使用情况,以及不同类型的网站。因此,我们得出结论,一些网站仍然手工编制数据,导致等待时间较长。少数例外情况没有响应任何数据或提供机器可读数据(GDRP第20条)。研究结果还揭示了个人在请求和访问他们的数据时面临的十种模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信