{"title":"From Global Commons to Territorial Seas: A Naval Analogy for the Nationalization of Cyberspace","authors":"Sam J. Tangredi","doi":"10.5038/2378-0789.3.1.1043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As one of the engines of modern globalization, the internet is perceived as having broken down barriers between cultures, ideologies and societies, and created a “democratization of technology.” An analogy generated by this perception is that cyberspace is a “global common” similar to the oceanic “high seas” to which individuals and nations can (or at least should) maintain equal and unfettered access. Not only is this analogy incorrect, its usage makes it is hard for political decision-makers to grasp the enormity of the threat to American infrastructure, global trade, and current prosperity posed by our cyber vulnerabilities. The reality is that authoritarian governments—with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the lead—have transformed the cyber “global common” into “territorial seas” in which others pass unmolested only at their sufferance, and to which access can be denied. Unfortunately, once an analogy takes hold in the popular or academic minds, it becomes the central core of explanation and defies most logical counterarguments. The analogy of cyberspace as a global common must be killed and replaced if decisionmakers are to comprehend the future of the medium, which is not a return to unfettered global access. We must clearly admit that cyber activity sails on a mosaic of adjoining territorial seas, not a vast, open ocean. Cyberspace is a nationalizing and militarizing environment of coast guards and forward outposts. This different analogy will assist in creating a mind-set that helps insure that Western democratic infrastructure does not go down with the digital ship. 1 Please cite as: Tangredi, Sam J., “From Global Commons to Territorial Sea: A Naval Analogy for the Nationalization of Cyberspace,” in Demchak, Chris C. and Benjamin Schechter, eds. Military Cyber Affairs: Cyber, Economics, and National Security 3, no. 1 (2018). 2 Director, Institute for Future Warfare Studies, U.S. Naval War College 1 Tangredi: From Global Commons to Territorial Seas: A Naval Analogy for the Nationalization of Cyberspace Published by Scholar Commons, 2018","PeriodicalId":345606,"journal":{"name":"Military Cyber Affairs","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Cyber Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5038/2378-0789.3.1.1043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
As one of the engines of modern globalization, the internet is perceived as having broken down barriers between cultures, ideologies and societies, and created a “democratization of technology.” An analogy generated by this perception is that cyberspace is a “global common” similar to the oceanic “high seas” to which individuals and nations can (or at least should) maintain equal and unfettered access. Not only is this analogy incorrect, its usage makes it is hard for political decision-makers to grasp the enormity of the threat to American infrastructure, global trade, and current prosperity posed by our cyber vulnerabilities. The reality is that authoritarian governments—with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the lead—have transformed the cyber “global common” into “territorial seas” in which others pass unmolested only at their sufferance, and to which access can be denied. Unfortunately, once an analogy takes hold in the popular or academic minds, it becomes the central core of explanation and defies most logical counterarguments. The analogy of cyberspace as a global common must be killed and replaced if decisionmakers are to comprehend the future of the medium, which is not a return to unfettered global access. We must clearly admit that cyber activity sails on a mosaic of adjoining territorial seas, not a vast, open ocean. Cyberspace is a nationalizing and militarizing environment of coast guards and forward outposts. This different analogy will assist in creating a mind-set that helps insure that Western democratic infrastructure does not go down with the digital ship. 1 Please cite as: Tangredi, Sam J., “From Global Commons to Territorial Sea: A Naval Analogy for the Nationalization of Cyberspace,” in Demchak, Chris C. and Benjamin Schechter, eds. Military Cyber Affairs: Cyber, Economics, and National Security 3, no. 1 (2018). 2 Director, Institute for Future Warfare Studies, U.S. Naval War College 1 Tangredi: From Global Commons to Territorial Seas: A Naval Analogy for the Nationalization of Cyberspace Published by Scholar Commons, 2018
作为现代全球化的引擎之一,互联网被认为打破了文化、意识形态和社会之间的障碍,创造了“技术民主化”。这种看法产生的一个类比是,网络空间是一个“全球共同的”,类似于海洋的“公海”,个人和国家可以(或至少应该)保持平等和不受限制的访问。这种类比不仅不正确,而且它的用法使政治决策者很难理解我们的网络漏洞对美国基础设施、全球贸易和当前繁荣构成的威胁的严重性。现实情况是,以中国共产党为首的威权政府已经将网络“全球公共”变成了“领海”,其他人只有在他们的默许下才能不受干扰地通过,并且可以拒绝进入。不幸的是,一旦一个类比在大众或学术头脑中占据了一席之地,它就会成为解释的核心,并无视大多数逻辑上的反驳。如果决策者要理解这种媒介的未来,就必须摒弃和取代将网络空间比喻为全球公共空间的做法,因为这不是回到不受限制的全球访问。我们必须清楚地承认,网络活动是在相邻的领海上进行的,而不是在广阔的公海上进行的。网络空间是海岸警卫队和前沿哨所的国有化和军事化环境。这种不同的类比将有助于创造一种思维模式,帮助确保西方民主基础设施不会随着数字船的沉没而沉没。1 Sam J. Tangredi,“从全球公域到领海:网络空间国家化的海军类比”,载于Demchak, Chris C.和Benjamin Schechter主编。军事网络事务:网络、经济和国家安全3期。1(2018)。2美国海军战争学院未来战争研究所所长1 Tangredi:《从全球公域到领海:网络空间国有化的海军类比》,学者公域,2018年出版