Comparative Evaluation of Basic Probabilistic Load Flow Methods with Wind Power Integration

V. Singh, T. Moger, D. Jena
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Basic Probabilistic Load Flow Methods with Wind Power Integration","authors":"V. Singh, T. Moger, D. Jena","doi":"10.1109/ICEPE50861.2021.9404524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unprecedented penetration of distributed energy resources (DERs) such as wind power generations (WPGs) poses tremendous challenges for for the planning and maintenance of power systems due to their intermittent and uncertain nature. This paper mainly focuses on comparing basic probabilistic load flow (PLF) techniques when WPGs are integrated into the existing power grid. Considering loads and WPGs as random inputs, the performance of the cumulant method (CM) and point estimation method (PEM) are analyzed with respect to Monte-Carlo method for higher precision and less computational time. Case-studies are carried out on sample 10-bus and SR 72-bus equivalent systems. Simulation results demonstrated that $2n+1$ PEM provides the best performance when dealing with high level of uncertainty associated with input variables.","PeriodicalId":250203,"journal":{"name":"2020 3rd International Conference on Energy, Power and Environment: Towards Clean Energy Technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 3rd International Conference on Energy, Power and Environment: Towards Clean Energy Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEPE50861.2021.9404524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The unprecedented penetration of distributed energy resources (DERs) such as wind power generations (WPGs) poses tremendous challenges for for the planning and maintenance of power systems due to their intermittent and uncertain nature. This paper mainly focuses on comparing basic probabilistic load flow (PLF) techniques when WPGs are integrated into the existing power grid. Considering loads and WPGs as random inputs, the performance of the cumulant method (CM) and point estimation method (PEM) are analyzed with respect to Monte-Carlo method for higher precision and less computational time. Case-studies are carried out on sample 10-bus and SR 72-bus equivalent systems. Simulation results demonstrated that $2n+1$ PEM provides the best performance when dealing with high level of uncertainty associated with input variables.
风电一体化基本概率潮流方法的比较评价
风力发电等分布式能源由于其间歇性和不确定性的特点,对电力系统的规划和维护提出了巨大的挑战。本文主要研究了当wpg并入现有电网时的基本概率潮流(PLF)技术。将载荷和wpg作为随机输入,分析了累积量法(CM)和点估计法(PEM)相对于蒙特卡罗方法具有更高的精度和更少的计算时间。对10总线和SR 72总线等效系统进行了实例研究。仿真结果表明,在处理与输入变量相关的高度不确定性时,$2n+1$ PEM提供了最佳性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信