Frederick Douglass, from Narration to Denunciation

Nolan Bennett
{"title":"Frederick Douglass, from Narration to Denunciation","authors":"Nolan Bennett","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190060695.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 2 shows how Frederick Douglass issued two claims across two antebellum narratives. In his 1845 Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, he both challenged the diminished legal and moral authority of black Americans and analyzed what of the plantation had oppressed him. Yet after his political ideas and ties developed in the following decade, Douglass wrote his 1855 My Bondage and My Freedom not as mere narrative but as denunciation. Whereas to narrate wrongs encouraged readers to judge Douglass’s story alongside moral criteria of justice, to denounce wrongs in Bondage implicated readers within the structures that create antebellum subjects on and off the plantation. This claim depended on Douglass’s renewed authority to analyze his life and on an analysis that revealed how the conditions of slavery implicate abolitionists and readers. Douglass’s book reached outward to demand his audience join him in solidarity for racial justice.","PeriodicalId":360342,"journal":{"name":"The Claims of Experience","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Claims of Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190060695.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 2 shows how Frederick Douglass issued two claims across two antebellum narratives. In his 1845 Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, he both challenged the diminished legal and moral authority of black Americans and analyzed what of the plantation had oppressed him. Yet after his political ideas and ties developed in the following decade, Douglass wrote his 1855 My Bondage and My Freedom not as mere narrative but as denunciation. Whereas to narrate wrongs encouraged readers to judge Douglass’s story alongside moral criteria of justice, to denounce wrongs in Bondage implicated readers within the structures that create antebellum subjects on and off the plantation. This claim depended on Douglass’s renewed authority to analyze his life and on an analysis that revealed how the conditions of slavery implicate abolitionists and readers. Douglass’s book reached outward to demand his audience join him in solidarity for racial justice.
弗雷德里克·道格拉斯,从叙述到谴责
第二章展示了弗雷德里克·道格拉斯是如何在两种内战前的叙述中提出两种主张的。在他1845年的《美国奴隶弗雷德里克·道格拉斯的一生》一书中,他既挑战了美国黑人在法律和道德上的权威,也分析了是什么压迫了他。然而,在接下来的十年里,随着他的政治思想和关系的发展,道格拉斯在1855年写了他的《我的束缚和自由》,不仅仅是叙述,而是谴责。叙述错误鼓励读者根据正义的道德标准来评判道格拉斯的故事,而谴责《奴役》中的错误则让读者置身于战前在种植园内外创造主体的结构之中。这一主张有赖于道格拉斯重新获得权威来分析他的生活,也有赖于他的分析揭示了奴隶制的状况如何与废奴主义者和读者联系在一起。道格拉斯的书向外延伸,要求他的读者和他一起为种族正义团结一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信