Identity of Patients with Reflux Disease in Connection with Aggression

N. Kravtsova, E.V. Kinyaykina, V.V. Trukhan
{"title":"Identity of Patients with Reflux Disease in Connection with Aggression","authors":"N. Kravtsova, E.V. Kinyaykina, V.V. Trukhan","doi":"10.17759/cpse.2022110102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study tested the hypothesis of difference of personality identity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy individuals and of association of difference with manifestations of aggressiveness. The sample of 75 subjects includes an experimental group of 45 patients, aged 21 to 38 years old (M=27.85, SD=3.21), with an established diagnosis of GERD, 66.7% men and 33.3% women. Control group of 30 normal individuals aged 21 to 32 years (М=26.90, SD=3.87), who do not have a history of GERD, 66.0% men and 40.0% women. The methodological complex includes: Method for the Study of Personal Identity Schneider (MILES); Questionnaire for Objective Measurement of Status Ego-Identity (adaption by Gavrilova, Glushak); ISTA (Tupitsyn et al.); the method “Types of aggressiveness” (Pochebut); Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory. The diffuse identity was revealed in 48.9% of patient group, the \"moratorium\" identity status was revealed in 20.0%, while achieved positive identity, premature identity, and pseudo-positive identity were found in 17.7%, 6.7%, and 6.7% of patients, accordingly. The \"moratorium\" identity status was revealed in 30.0% of normal group, while achieved positive identity, \"moratorium\" identity, and pseudo-positive identity were found in 26.6%, 23.3%, and 16.7% of patients, accordingly. Also, in GERD patients following connections with different aggression indicators were revealed depending on the identity status: the status of the adopted identity is directly related to the object aggression; the status of \na moratorium related with the deficit aggression, the status of achieved identity related with the indirect aggression and guilt. Personal identity indicator corresponds to the status of accepted and diffuse identity. It was revealed that the lower state of personal identity indicator connected to the higher state of the irritation and hostility in patients. The control group did not reveal significant links between the indicators of identity and indicators of aggression.\n","PeriodicalId":344078,"journal":{"name":"Клиническая и специальная психология","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Клиническая и специальная психология","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2022110102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study tested the hypothesis of difference of personality identity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy individuals and of association of difference with manifestations of aggressiveness. The sample of 75 subjects includes an experimental group of 45 patients, aged 21 to 38 years old (M=27.85, SD=3.21), with an established diagnosis of GERD, 66.7% men and 33.3% women. Control group of 30 normal individuals aged 21 to 32 years (М=26.90, SD=3.87), who do not have a history of GERD, 66.0% men and 40.0% women. The methodological complex includes: Method for the Study of Personal Identity Schneider (MILES); Questionnaire for Objective Measurement of Status Ego-Identity (adaption by Gavrilova, Glushak); ISTA (Tupitsyn et al.); the method “Types of aggressiveness” (Pochebut); Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory. The diffuse identity was revealed in 48.9% of patient group, the "moratorium" identity status was revealed in 20.0%, while achieved positive identity, premature identity, and pseudo-positive identity were found in 17.7%, 6.7%, and 6.7% of patients, accordingly. The "moratorium" identity status was revealed in 30.0% of normal group, while achieved positive identity, "moratorium" identity, and pseudo-positive identity were found in 26.6%, 23.3%, and 16.7% of patients, accordingly. Also, in GERD patients following connections with different aggression indicators were revealed depending on the identity status: the status of the adopted identity is directly related to the object aggression; the status of a moratorium related with the deficit aggression, the status of achieved identity related with the indirect aggression and guilt. Personal identity indicator corresponds to the status of accepted and diffuse identity. It was revealed that the lower state of personal identity indicator connected to the higher state of the irritation and hostility in patients. The control group did not reveal significant links between the indicators of identity and indicators of aggression.
与攻击相关的反流性疾病患者的身份
本研究检验了胃食管反流病(GERD)患者与健康个体的人格认同差异假说,以及人格认同差异与攻击性表现的关联假说。75例受试者包括实验组45例患者,年龄21 ~ 38岁(M=27.85, SD=3.21),确诊为GERD,男性占66.7%,女性占33.3%。对照组为30名无GERD病史的21 ~ 32岁正常人(М=26.90, SD=3.87),男性66.0%,女性40.0%。方法论综合体包括:施耐德个人同一性研究方法(MILES);地位自我同一性客观测量问卷(Gavrilova, Glushak改编)ISTA (Tupitsyn et al.);“攻击性类型”方法(Pochebut);巴斯-德基敌意量表。弥漫性身份占48.9%,“暂停性”身份占20.0%,而获得阳性身份、过早身份和伪阳性身份分别占17.7%、6.7%和6.7%。正常组出现“暂停”身份状态的占30.0%,达到“阳性”身份的占26.6%,“暂停”身份的占23.3%,假阳性身份的占16.7%。在胃食管反流患者中,不同身份状态与不同攻击指标之间存在以下联系:被采用身份状态与客体攻击直接相关;暂停状态与赤字攻击相关,达成认同状态与间接攻击和罪恶感相关。个人同一性指标对应的是被接受的和扩散的同一性状态。结果表明,个体同一性指数越低,患者的愤怒和敌意越高。控制组没有显示出身份指标和攻击指标之间的显著联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信