Prospective study of quality of life in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2

I. Bozovic, I. Basta, Ana Čosić, Aleksa Palibrk, I. Kezic, V. Ivanović, J. Lazovic, S. Perić
{"title":"Prospective study of quality of life in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2","authors":"I. Bozovic, I. Basta, Ana Čosić, Aleksa Palibrk, I. Kezic, V. Ivanović, J. Lazovic, S. Perić","doi":"10.5937/medi55-40874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/aim: Although myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is generally milder than DM1, quality of life (QoL) seems to be similarly impaired in these two disorders. There are no studies that assessed QoL during DM2. Our aim was to assess QoL and disease outcome in patients with DM2 after a five-year follow-up period. Material and Methods: Study originally comprised 49 DM2 patients at baseline. During the five-year period, seven patients died, eight were lost to follow-up, one patient moved, and one refused testing. The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) and Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life (INQoL) questionnaires were administered in 30 patients at baseline and at follow-up (47% males, 54±10 years old). Results: Patients who were retested had better Role Physical (RP) and General Health (GH) scores of the SF-36 and better weakness score of the INQoL compared to non-retested (p>0.05). After the five-year follow-up, none of the SF-36 and INQoL scores differed compared to baseline (p>0.05). Conclusion: QoL did not change in DM2 patients during a five-year period, as measured by both SF-36 and INQoL.","PeriodicalId":167411,"journal":{"name":"Medicinska istrazivanja","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinska istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/medi55-40874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/aim: Although myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is generally milder than DM1, quality of life (QoL) seems to be similarly impaired in these two disorders. There are no studies that assessed QoL during DM2. Our aim was to assess QoL and disease outcome in patients with DM2 after a five-year follow-up period. Material and Methods: Study originally comprised 49 DM2 patients at baseline. During the five-year period, seven patients died, eight were lost to follow-up, one patient moved, and one refused testing. The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) and Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life (INQoL) questionnaires were administered in 30 patients at baseline and at follow-up (47% males, 54±10 years old). Results: Patients who were retested had better Role Physical (RP) and General Health (GH) scores of the SF-36 and better weakness score of the INQoL compared to non-retested (p>0.05). After the five-year follow-up, none of the SF-36 and INQoL scores differed compared to baseline (p>0.05). Conclusion: QoL did not change in DM2 patients during a five-year period, as measured by both SF-36 and INQoL.
2型强直性肌营养不良患者生活质量的前瞻性研究
简介/目的:虽然2型肌强直性营养不良(DM2)通常比DM1轻,但这两种疾病的生活质量(QoL)似乎相似。没有研究评估DM2期间的生活质量。我们的目的是在5年随访期后评估DM2患者的生活质量和疾病结局。材料和方法:研究最初纳入49例DM2患者作为基线。在5年的时间里,7名患者死亡,8名患者无法随访,1名患者移动,1名患者拒绝检测。在基线和随访时对30例患者(47%男性,54±10岁)进行简短(36)健康调查(SF-36)和个性化神经肌肉生活质量(INQoL)问卷调查。结果:重测患者SF-36的角色生理(RP)、一般健康(GH)评分和INQoL的无力评分均优于未重测患者(p>0.05)。5年随访后,SF-36和INQoL评分与基线比较均无差异(p>0.05)。结论:通过SF-36和INQoL测量,DM2患者的生活质量在5年期间没有变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信