Using Social Listening to Evaluate Opinion Research for Social Network Brand Community

Tse-Chuan Hsu, Dong-Meau Chang, Hsin-Jan Lee, Chun-Yu Hsu
{"title":"Using Social Listening to Evaluate Opinion Research for Social Network Brand Community","authors":"Tse-Chuan Hsu, Dong-Meau Chang, Hsin-Jan Lee, Chun-Yu Hsu","doi":"10.1109/TSA.2015.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The social network public opinion analysis techniques to the analysis of the current industry value, through a network of resources collected for comparison, checking out for consumers and industry benchmark, a sense of community in this study to the analysis of public opinion as the core for network public information public behavior data collection and data information to be compared against the conditional screened population samples to a network of public opinion data collection related factors, including network on the news, Facebook blog. In this study, we collect a minimum of 1,000 compares document information and definition describes clause positive or negative statement syntax features, such as with the weights given to quantify substances scores and use the tree line graph provides a comparative analysis of the condition of two or more products analyzed and compared to the value per unit weight. In this study and Apple and Samsung mobile phone on the website in Taiwan for 15 days after the public disclosure of information of public opinion information community information and news big data of comparative case studies used.","PeriodicalId":293345,"journal":{"name":"2015 Second International Conference on Trustworthy Systems and Their Applications","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Second International Conference on Trustworthy Systems and Their Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSA.2015.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The social network public opinion analysis techniques to the analysis of the current industry value, through a network of resources collected for comparison, checking out for consumers and industry benchmark, a sense of community in this study to the analysis of public opinion as the core for network public information public behavior data collection and data information to be compared against the conditional screened population samples to a network of public opinion data collection related factors, including network on the news, Facebook blog. In this study, we collect a minimum of 1,000 compares document information and definition describes clause positive or negative statement syntax features, such as with the weights given to quantify substances scores and use the tree line graph provides a comparative analysis of the condition of two or more products analyzed and compared to the value per unit weight. In this study and Apple and Samsung mobile phone on the website in Taiwan for 15 days after the public disclosure of information of public opinion information community information and news big data of comparative case studies used.
基于社会倾听的社交网络品牌社区评价意见研究
社交网络舆情分析技术对当前行业价值进行分析,通过网络上收集的资源进行比较,为消费者和行业检验出标杆;本研究以社区意识分析为核心,对网络公共信息进行公众行为数据收集,并将数据信息与有条件筛选的人群样本进行比较,得出网络公共信息数据收集的相关因素,包括网络上的新闻、Facebook上的博客。在本研究中,我们收集了至少1000个比较文档信息和定义描述子句的肯定或否定语句的语法特征,如用给定的权重来量化物质的得分,并使用树线图提供比较分析条件,对两个或多个产品的每单位权重进行分析和比较。本研究与苹果和三星手机网站在台湾公开披露信息15天后对舆情信息社区信息和新闻大数据进行了对比案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信