Comparison of annotating duplication, tree mapping, and copying as methods to compare gene trees with species trees

O. Eulenstein, B. Mirkin, M. Vingron
{"title":"Comparison of annotating duplication, tree mapping, and copying as methods to compare gene trees with species trees","authors":"O. Eulenstein, B. Mirkin, M. Vingron","doi":"10.1090/dimacs/037/05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews the authors work on the idea of employing the mechanism of gene duplication in explaining the di erences between a gene and species trees Three existing approaches are presented as based on a tree mapping b annotating duplication and c copying duplication modeling Correspondences between a and b and b and c are mathematically explored It is proven in particular that approaches b and c lead to equivalent duplication histories Moreover all the three approaches equivalently count the numbers of duplications and losses needed to explain all the di erences between trees","PeriodicalId":336874,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Hierarchies and Biology","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Hierarchies and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1090/dimacs/037/05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This paper reviews the authors work on the idea of employing the mechanism of gene duplication in explaining the di erences between a gene and species trees Three existing approaches are presented as based on a tree mapping b annotating duplication and c copying duplication modeling Correspondences between a and b and b and c are mathematically explored It is proven in particular that approaches b and c lead to equivalent duplication histories Moreover all the three approaches equivalently count the numbers of duplications and losses needed to explain all the di erences between trees
基因树与物种树比较的方法有注释复制、树作图和复制
综述作者工作的用人机制的基因重复解释基因和物种之间的di erences树三现有方法提出了基于b树映射注释重复和c复制重复建模之间的通讯和b和b和c是数学研究证明在特定方法b和c导致等效重复历史此外的所有三种方法等同于计数重复和损失的数量需要解释树木之间的所有差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信