Comparing IRI and regional ionospheric model with ionosonde foF2 measurements in Pakistan

M. Talha, Ghulam Murtaza, M. A. Ameen
{"title":"Comparing IRI and regional ionospheric model with ionosonde foF2 measurements in Pakistan","authors":"M. Talha, Ghulam Murtaza, M. A. Ameen","doi":"10.1109/ICONSPACE.2015.7283755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical frequency of F2 layer acquired by three ionosonde stations, Karachi (KHI, 24.95°N, 67.13°E), Multan (MUL, 30.18°N, 71.48°E) & Islamabad (ISL, 33.75°N, 73.13°E), in Pakistan has been compared with foF2 obtained from global ionospheric model IRI-2012 and computed from regional ionospheric model using higher terms of Emperical Orthogonal Functions (EOFs) during summer (July). The data has been compared at different phases of solar epoches. The computational sets using higher number of terms of EOFs (L > 1) showed slight different deviations from observations with respect to the expansion of EOFs using least number of terms (L = 1). Both models revealed good to reasonable agreement with the observed values for Multan and Islamabad. However for Karachi, considerable deviations between the models and observations are noted at different solar epoches except deep solar minimum due to its location which lies within equatorial ionization anomaly region. In general, regional model gives better results compared to IRI for MUL and ISL whereas IRI worked better for Karachi. Thus further improvements in regional model are required to get promosing results especially for EIA region station.","PeriodicalId":150022,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Space Science and Communication (IconSpace)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Space Science and Communication (IconSpace)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONSPACE.2015.7283755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Critical frequency of F2 layer acquired by three ionosonde stations, Karachi (KHI, 24.95°N, 67.13°E), Multan (MUL, 30.18°N, 71.48°E) & Islamabad (ISL, 33.75°N, 73.13°E), in Pakistan has been compared with foF2 obtained from global ionospheric model IRI-2012 and computed from regional ionospheric model using higher terms of Emperical Orthogonal Functions (EOFs) during summer (July). The data has been compared at different phases of solar epoches. The computational sets using higher number of terms of EOFs (L > 1) showed slight different deviations from observations with respect to the expansion of EOFs using least number of terms (L = 1). Both models revealed good to reasonable agreement with the observed values for Multan and Islamabad. However for Karachi, considerable deviations between the models and observations are noted at different solar epoches except deep solar minimum due to its location which lies within equatorial ionization anomaly region. In general, regional model gives better results compared to IRI for MUL and ISL whereas IRI worked better for Karachi. Thus further improvements in regional model are required to get promosing results especially for EIA region station.
比较IRI和区域电离层模式与巴基斯坦电离层探测仪测量的of2
巴基斯坦卡拉奇(KHI, 24.95°N, 67.13°E)、木尔坦(MUL, 30.18°N, 71.48°E)和伊斯兰堡(ISL, 33.75°N, 73.13°E) 3个电离层监测站获取的F2层临界频率与全球电离层模式ir -2012获得的F2层临界频率以及使用经验正交函数(EOFs)高项计算的区域电离层模式在夏季(7月)的foF2进行了比较。这些数据已经在太阳活动的不同阶段进行了比较。对于使用最少项数(L = 1)的EOFs扩展,使用较多项数(L > 1)的计算集与观测值的偏差略有不同,两个模型与木尔坦和伊斯兰堡的观测值具有较好的一致性。然而,对于卡拉奇,由于其位于赤道电离异常区内,除了太阳深极小期外,在不同的太阳期模式与观测值之间存在较大的偏差。一般来说,区域模型对MUL和ISL的效果比IRI好,而IRI对卡拉奇的效果更好。因此,需要进一步改进区域模型,以取得促进效果,特别是对EIA区域站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信