Administrative Courts a Defense Against Populism

A. Fierro
{"title":"Administrative Courts a Defense Against Populism","authors":"A. Fierro","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20200034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past two decades, populist governments have proliferated in America. These governments are characterized by reducing to mere formalism the procedures of control of the rule and intervene in the judiciary and administrative courts. Modern society worked hard to achieve legal systems based on the rule of law, in order to prevent citizens from being subject to the will of one leader. In our legal systems administrative courts play a fundamental role improving state bodies. This paper explores the use of administrative courts as accountability mechanisms that protect the rule of law. We suggest that administrative courts are powerful procedures for accountability and control against abuse of powers. Finally, we recommend  states should broaden access to these mechanisms, given the fact that administrative trails are still very restricted to most of the citizens.”","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"66 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Juris Poiesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20200034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past two decades, populist governments have proliferated in America. These governments are characterized by reducing to mere formalism the procedures of control of the rule and intervene in the judiciary and administrative courts. Modern society worked hard to achieve legal systems based on the rule of law, in order to prevent citizens from being subject to the will of one leader. In our legal systems administrative courts play a fundamental role improving state bodies. This paper explores the use of administrative courts as accountability mechanisms that protect the rule of law. We suggest that administrative courts are powerful procedures for accountability and control against abuse of powers. Finally, we recommend  states should broaden access to these mechanisms, given the fact that administrative trails are still very restricted to most of the citizens.”
行政法院是对民粹主义的辩护
在过去的二十年里,民粹主义政府在美国遍地开花。这些政府的特点是将控制规则的程序简化为纯粹的形式主义,并干预司法和行政法院。现代社会努力建立以法治为基础的法律制度,以防止公民受制于一个领导人的意志。在我国法律体系中,行政法院发挥着完善国家机关的基础性作用。本文探讨了利用行政法院作为保护法治的问责机制。我们建议,行政法院是问责制和控制权力滥用的有力程序。最后,我们建议各州扩大这些机制的使用范围,因为行政诉讼仍然非常局限于大多数公民。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信