TÓPICO DISCURSIVO E CONSTRUÇÃO DO PONTO DE VISTA NA TESSITURA ARGUMENTATIVA DE REDAÇÕES DE VESTIBULANDOS

R. Silva, S. Cortez
{"title":"TÓPICO DISCURSIVO E CONSTRUÇÃO DO PONTO DE VISTA NA TESSITURA ARGUMENTATIVA DE REDAÇÕES DE VESTIBULANDOS","authors":"R. Silva, S. Cortez","doi":"10.29327/232521.2.2-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Brazil’s Text Liguistics studies, the discursive topic, as a category of textual- interactive analysis, has been studied for almost three decades in the various text genres (PINHEIRO, 2005). Regarded as the common thread of the text (JUBRAN, 2006a; 2006b), in argumentative genres – such as the entrance exam essay – it has already been associated with Jean-Michel Adam’s argumentative sequences (ALENCAR e FARIA, 2014) and with Michel Charolles’ coherence metarules (LINS et al., 2017; SA, 2018). However, with the new trends in argumentation analysis of textual studies, we believe that it can also be associated with the studies of argumentation in discourse (AMOSSY, 2018), as well as the rabatelian theory studies in point of view (CORTEZ, 2011; RABATEL, 2013; 2016). Therefore, our goal is to investigate how, in two essays of Enem applicants, the topic is led in a way that it guides the argumentation and formulates the point of view and the meanings of these texts. After the analysis, we noticed that both texts present argumentative orientation and maintenance of the topical progression/continuity.so that their points of view can be formulated and consolidated coherently.","PeriodicalId":297235,"journal":{"name":"Revista Lingua Nostra","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Lingua Nostra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29327/232521.2.2-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Brazil’s Text Liguistics studies, the discursive topic, as a category of textual- interactive analysis, has been studied for almost three decades in the various text genres (PINHEIRO, 2005). Regarded as the common thread of the text (JUBRAN, 2006a; 2006b), in argumentative genres – such as the entrance exam essay – it has already been associated with Jean-Michel Adam’s argumentative sequences (ALENCAR e FARIA, 2014) and with Michel Charolles’ coherence metarules (LINS et al., 2017; SA, 2018). However, with the new trends in argumentation analysis of textual studies, we believe that it can also be associated with the studies of argumentation in discourse (AMOSSY, 2018), as well as the rabatelian theory studies in point of view (CORTEZ, 2011; RABATEL, 2013; 2016). Therefore, our goal is to investigate how, in two essays of Enem applicants, the topic is led in a way that it guides the argumentation and formulates the point of view and the meanings of these texts. After the analysis, we noticed that both texts present argumentative orientation and maintenance of the topical progression/continuity.so that their points of view can be formulated and consolidated coherently.
高考学生论文议论文结构中的论述主题与观点建构
在巴西的文本语言学研究中,话语主题作为文本互动分析的一个范畴,已经在各种文本类型中研究了近三十年(PINHEIRO, 2005)。被视为文本的共同线索(JUBRAN, 2006a;2006b),在议论文类型中——比如入学考试作文——它已经与让-米歇尔·亚当的议论文序列(ALENCAR e FARIA, 2014)和米歇尔·查尔斯的连贯元规则(LINS等人,2017;SA, 2018)。然而,随着文本研究的论证分析的新趋势,我们认为它也可以与话语中的论证研究(AMOSSY, 2018)以及观点中的rabatelian理论研究(CORTEZ, 2011;RABATEL, 2013;2016)。因此,我们的目标是调查,在两篇Enem申请人的论文中,主题是如何引导论证,并阐述这些文本的观点和意义的。在分析之后,我们注意到这两个文本都呈现出论证的倾向,并保持了主题的进展/连续性。这样他们的观点就可以连贯地表述和巩固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信