Sharpening the Teeth of EU Social Fundamental Rights? The Case of State Pension Age in the UK

H. V. Meerten
{"title":"Sharpening the Teeth of EU Social Fundamental Rights? The Case of State Pension Age in the UK","authors":"H. V. Meerten","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3476634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this contribution I want to discuss an important and very topical EU Law element of the judgment regarding two claimants (Delve and Glynn), backed by BackTo60, versus the UK Department of Work and Pensions (hereafter: Delve and Glynn). Claimants argued inter alia that the UK State Pension Age (SPA)was discriminatory. \n \nI want to focus here not if SPA is discriminatory, but whether the (SPA) falls in the ambit of EU law. Didn’t the UK Court (the Court) in Delve and Glynn conclude too easily that SPA falls outside the scope of EU Law? In other words, how can we further sharpen the teeth of EU social protection?","PeriodicalId":206501,"journal":{"name":"European Economics: Labor & Social Conditions eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economics: Labor & Social Conditions eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3476634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this contribution I want to discuss an important and very topical EU Law element of the judgment regarding two claimants (Delve and Glynn), backed by BackTo60, versus the UK Department of Work and Pensions (hereafter: Delve and Glynn). Claimants argued inter alia that the UK State Pension Age (SPA)was discriminatory. I want to focus here not if SPA is discriminatory, but whether the (SPA) falls in the ambit of EU law. Didn’t the UK Court (the Court) in Delve and Glynn conclude too easily that SPA falls outside the scope of EU Law? In other words, how can we further sharpen the teeth of EU social protection?
磨砺欧盟社会基本权利的牙齿?英国国家养老金年龄的案例
在这篇文章中,我想讨论关于BackTo60支持的两个索赔人(Delve和Glynn)与英国工作和养老金部(以下简称:Delve和Glynn)的判决中一个重要且非常热门的欧盟法律要素。索赔人特别指出,英国国家养老金年龄(SPA)是歧视性的。我想关注的不是SPA是否具有歧视性,而是SPA是否属于欧盟法律的范围。英国法院在Delve和Glynn案中是不是太容易得出结论,SPA不在欧盟法的范围之内?换句话说,我们如何才能进一步磨尖欧盟社会保护的牙齿?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信