Evaluating Coherence of Essays using Sentence-similarity Networks

K. Zupanc, M. Savić, Z. Bosnić, M. Ivanović
{"title":"Evaluating Coherence of Essays using Sentence-similarity Networks","authors":"K. Zupanc, M. Savić, Z. Bosnić, M. Ivanović","doi":"10.1145/3134302.3134322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main weakness of automated essay evaluation systems is their predominant focus on vocabulary and text syntax, while consideration of text semantics is often neglected. In this work, we propose several new attributes for measuring coherence and consistency of essays that are based on a network representation of essays. In this representation, nodes represent sentences and links reflect similarity between them. We evaluated the proposed attributes on a benchmark dataset showing that their integration into a state-of-the-art system for essay evaluation indicates a potential for improvement of predictive performance.","PeriodicalId":131196,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3134302.3134322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The main weakness of automated essay evaluation systems is their predominant focus on vocabulary and text syntax, while consideration of text semantics is often neglected. In this work, we propose several new attributes for measuring coherence and consistency of essays that are based on a network representation of essays. In this representation, nodes represent sentences and links reflect similarity between them. We evaluated the proposed attributes on a benchmark dataset showing that their integration into a state-of-the-art system for essay evaluation indicates a potential for improvement of predictive performance.
利用句子相似性网络评估论文的一致性
自动论文评价系统的主要弱点在于它们主要关注词汇和文本语法,而对文本语义的考虑往往被忽视。在这项工作中,我们提出了几种新的属性来衡量文章的连贯性和一致性,这些属性基于文章的网络表示法。在这种表示法中,节点代表句子,链接反映句子之间的相似性。我们在一个基准数据集上对所提出的属性进行了评估,结果表明,将这些属性整合到最先进的论文评估系统中,有望提高预测性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信