Overhead estimation of selected protocols for file transfer

M. Muhammad, M. Berioli
{"title":"Overhead estimation of selected protocols for file transfer","authors":"M. Muhammad, M. Berioli","doi":"10.1109/ASMS-SPSC.2010.5586926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we derive an analytical model for the estimation of the overhead introduced in a file transfer procedure by three different reliable protocols, namely TCP, SCTP, and Saratoga. The model estimates the introduced overhead down to the IP layer, taking into account uncorrelated packet loss on the channel. The model distinguishes between the overhead on the forward link (server to client), mainly due to packet headers and retransmissions, from the overhead on the return link (client to server), which is mainly due to acknowledgments. By carrying out experimental tests, we show that the model predictions match very well with the trial results. Further, Saratoga shows the lowest overhead costs, especially for the smaller files sizes; nevertheless, on the expense of removing mechanisms like flow control and congestion control.","PeriodicalId":221214,"journal":{"name":"2010 5th Advanced Satellite Multimedia Systems Conference and the 11th Signal Processing for Space Communications Workshop","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 5th Advanced Satellite Multimedia Systems Conference and the 11th Signal Processing for Space Communications Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMS-SPSC.2010.5586926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this paper, we derive an analytical model for the estimation of the overhead introduced in a file transfer procedure by three different reliable protocols, namely TCP, SCTP, and Saratoga. The model estimates the introduced overhead down to the IP layer, taking into account uncorrelated packet loss on the channel. The model distinguishes between the overhead on the forward link (server to client), mainly due to packet headers and retransmissions, from the overhead on the return link (client to server), which is mainly due to acknowledgments. By carrying out experimental tests, we show that the model predictions match very well with the trial results. Further, Saratoga shows the lowest overhead costs, especially for the smaller files sizes; nevertheless, on the expense of removing mechanisms like flow control and congestion control.
所选文件传输协议的开销估计
在本文中,我们推导了一个分析模型,用于估计通过三种不同的可靠协议(即TCP, SCTP和Saratoga)在文件传输过程中引入的开销。该模型估计引入的开销一直到IP层,考虑到信道上不相关的数据包丢失。该模型将转发链路(服务器到客户端)的开销与返回链路(客户端到服务器)的开销区分开来,前者主要是由于数据包头和重传,后者主要是由于确认。通过实验验证,模型预测结果与试验结果吻合良好。此外,Saratoga显示了最低的开销成本,特别是对于较小的文件大小;然而,这是以去除流控制和拥塞控制等机制为代价的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信