Ethics in Security Research: Visions, Reality, and Paths Forward

Yiming Zhang, Mingxuan Liu, Mingming Zhang, Chaoyi Lu, Haixin Duan
{"title":"Ethics in Security Research: Visions, Reality, and Paths Forward","authors":"Yiming Zhang, Mingxuan Liu, Mingming Zhang, Chaoyi Lu, Haixin Duan","doi":"10.1109/eurospw55150.2022.00064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethics has become a prevalent and important criterion for academic research. However, achieving ethical compliance in practice is a highly complex and specialized task. In the field of computer security research, although top-tier conferences all have set out visions for ethical compliance, researchers may encounter practical dilemmas such as the lack of assistance from legal departments and the absence of specific domain guidelines, leading to various realistic obstacles to ethical treatment. This paper provides a comprehensive investigation of ethical considerations in computer security research. We first summarize the ethical requirements of top-tier security and network conferences. Then, based on a survey of 6,078 academic papers and an online investigation of 248 researchers mainly from a Chinese security community, we reveal the current status and practical issues of ethical considerations in security research. In particular, given the plight of the lack of authoritative ethical guidance, we offer a series of suggestions on how researchers at institutions without authoritative departments could best mitigate ethical risks. We also raise several open questions, and expect to help seek paths towards better ethical compliance for the security community.","PeriodicalId":275840,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/eurospw55150.2022.00064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Ethics has become a prevalent and important criterion for academic research. However, achieving ethical compliance in practice is a highly complex and specialized task. In the field of computer security research, although top-tier conferences all have set out visions for ethical compliance, researchers may encounter practical dilemmas such as the lack of assistance from legal departments and the absence of specific domain guidelines, leading to various realistic obstacles to ethical treatment. This paper provides a comprehensive investigation of ethical considerations in computer security research. We first summarize the ethical requirements of top-tier security and network conferences. Then, based on a survey of 6,078 academic papers and an online investigation of 248 researchers mainly from a Chinese security community, we reveal the current status and practical issues of ethical considerations in security research. In particular, given the plight of the lack of authoritative ethical guidance, we offer a series of suggestions on how researchers at institutions without authoritative departments could best mitigate ethical risks. We also raise several open questions, and expect to help seek paths towards better ethical compliance for the security community.
安全研究中的伦理学:愿景、现实和前进的道路
伦理已经成为学术研究的一个普遍而重要的标准。然而,在实践中实现道德合规是一项高度复杂和专业化的任务。在计算机安全研究领域,虽然顶级会议都提出了伦理合规的愿景,但研究人员可能会遇到现实困境,如缺乏法律部门的帮助和缺乏具体的领域指导方针,导致各种现实的伦理治疗障碍。本文对计算机安全研究中的伦理问题进行了全面调查。我们首先总结了顶级安全和网络会议的伦理要求。然后,基于对6078篇学术论文的调查和对248名主要来自中国安全社区的研究人员的在线调查,我们揭示了安全研究中伦理考虑的现状和现实问题。特别是,鉴于缺乏权威伦理指导的困境,我们就没有权威部门的机构的研究人员如何最好地减轻伦理风险提出了一系列建议。我们还提出了几个悬而未决的问题,并希望帮助安全社区寻求更好的道德合规途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信