{"title":"Do Amish One-Room Schools Make the Grade? The Dubious Data of Wisconsin v. Yoder","authors":"W. Fischel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1800409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), allowed the Old Order Amish to limit their children’s education to eight grades in private, one-room schools that resemble those of the nineteenth century. An important factual claim in Yoder was that Amish education was as effective as that provided by modern public elementary schools. This claim was supported by a statistical study directed by John Hostetler, the chief expert witness for the Amish. I show here that Hostetler’s data and findings should not have been taken seriously. I bring this charge not to urge that the Amish be herded back to public schools but to support a position I advanced in Making the Grade (Chicago 2009). I argued there that school-district consolidation from 1900 to 1970, which eliminated public one-room schools, was driven by popular demand for high school education and not, as is commonly assumed, by the top-down commands of state bureaucrats. It appears that the Amish maintain one-room schools for the very reason that non-Amish voters agreed to abandon them in the twentieth century: The education they provide is inadequate preparation for high school. I conclude by questioning the relevance of Yoder for present-day Amish education.","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1800409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), allowed the Old Order Amish to limit their children’s education to eight grades in private, one-room schools that resemble those of the nineteenth century. An important factual claim in Yoder was that Amish education was as effective as that provided by modern public elementary schools. This claim was supported by a statistical study directed by John Hostetler, the chief expert witness for the Amish. I show here that Hostetler’s data and findings should not have been taken seriously. I bring this charge not to urge that the Amish be herded back to public schools but to support a position I advanced in Making the Grade (Chicago 2009). I argued there that school-district consolidation from 1900 to 1970, which eliminated public one-room schools, was driven by popular demand for high school education and not, as is commonly assumed, by the top-down commands of state bureaucrats. It appears that the Amish maintain one-room schools for the very reason that non-Amish voters agreed to abandon them in the twentieth century: The education they provide is inadequate preparation for high school. I conclude by questioning the relevance of Yoder for present-day Amish education.
威斯康辛诉约德案(Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205(1972))允许旧秩序的阿米什人将其子女的教育限制在类似于19世纪的私立单间学校的八个年级。约德书中一个重要的事实是,阿米什人的教育和现代公立小学的教育一样有效。这一说法得到了约翰·霍斯特勒(John Hostetler)主持的一项统计研究的支持,他是阿米什人的首席专家证人。我在这里表明,Hostetler的数据和发现不应该被认真对待。我提出这一指控并不是为了敦促把阿米什人赶回公立学校,而是为了支持我在《达标》(2009年芝加哥)一书中提出的观点。我在那篇文章中指出,1900年至1970年的学区合并,取消了公立的一室学校,是受大众对高中教育的需求推动的,而不是像人们通常认为的那样,是由国家官僚自上而下的命令推动的。看来,阿米什人维持一室学校的原因,正是非阿米什选民在20世纪同意放弃这种学校的原因:他们提供的教育不足以为高中做好准备。最后,我质疑约德与当今阿米什教育的相关性。