I.DÜNYA HARBİ VE OSMANLI KAMUOYU: GÜNLÜK VE HATIRALAR ÜZERİNDEN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Erdal Aydoğan, Umut Akcakaya
{"title":"I.DÜNYA HARBİ VE OSMANLI KAMUOYU: GÜNLÜK VE HATIRALAR ÜZERİNDEN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME","authors":"Erdal Aydoğan, Umut Akcakaya","doi":"10.33431/belgi.925172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In general, public opinion is defined as the prevailing opinion shared among a group or groups which dealing with a raising issue at a certain time. According to this definition, public opnion includes opinions which supported by the majority. As for other definition, public opinion is the opinions that is directed by different communities towards governments and required to be considered by those governments. So, public opnion is a sort of political participation. Ottoman Empire was destroyed after a four-years war, and then the Republic was founded. The responsibility of entering the war on the side of Germany after the defeat, which caused the end of empire, was attributed to a handful of administrators. Especially Enver, Cemal and Talat Pashas were held responsible for this rout. The responsibility of these persons, who were in the dominant position in decision-making, could not be denied. But, is it possible to believe that just the decisions of these persons caused the end of the empire? Was there any public opinion behind the decision of entering war on the side of Germany which affected these administrators? If yes, what were the factors shaping the public opinion? The witnesses from the period, when the war began, showed that the administrators were not alone in terms of their pro-war attitude. It can be said that the Ottoman public opinion was generally shaped in favor of the war. In this regard, it seems that some nationalist organizations and groups such as Türk Ocağı (Turkish Society), Donanma Cemiyeti (Armada Society), Müdafaa-i Milliye Cemiyeti, were effective in shaping public opnion. Among with the Balkan War nationalist propagandas increased it’s influence and the disasters, which caused by the Balkan War, have opened a deep gap between muslims and non-muslims. In fact, Ottomanism failed after the Balkan War and the nationalist movemet, which expanding from Turkism to Turanism, has gained momentum. Particulary, Turanist and Pan- Islamist war propaganda was densely carried during August- November in 1914, which had a wide impact upon the young generation at that time. Under these circumstances, war was seen as legitimate and necessary alternative.","PeriodicalId":164471,"journal":{"name":"Belgi Dergisi","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belgi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33431/belgi.925172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In general, public opinion is defined as the prevailing opinion shared among a group or groups which dealing with a raising issue at a certain time. According to this definition, public opnion includes opinions which supported by the majority. As for other definition, public opinion is the opinions that is directed by different communities towards governments and required to be considered by those governments. So, public opnion is a sort of political participation. Ottoman Empire was destroyed after a four-years war, and then the Republic was founded. The responsibility of entering the war on the side of Germany after the defeat, which caused the end of empire, was attributed to a handful of administrators. Especially Enver, Cemal and Talat Pashas were held responsible for this rout. The responsibility of these persons, who were in the dominant position in decision-making, could not be denied. But, is it possible to believe that just the decisions of these persons caused the end of the empire? Was there any public opinion behind the decision of entering war on the side of Germany which affected these administrators? If yes, what were the factors shaping the public opinion? The witnesses from the period, when the war began, showed that the administrators were not alone in terms of their pro-war attitude. It can be said that the Ottoman public opinion was generally shaped in favor of the war. In this regard, it seems that some nationalist organizations and groups such as Türk Ocağı (Turkish Society), Donanma Cemiyeti (Armada Society), Müdafaa-i Milliye Cemiyeti, were effective in shaping public opnion. Among with the Balkan War nationalist propagandas increased it’s influence and the disasters, which caused by the Balkan War, have opened a deep gap between muslims and non-muslims. In fact, Ottomanism failed after the Balkan War and the nationalist movemet, which expanding from Turkism to Turanism, has gained momentum. Particulary, Turanist and Pan- Islamist war propaganda was densely carried during August- November in 1914, which had a wide impact upon the young generation at that time. Under these circumstances, war was seen as legitimate and necessary alternative.
一般来说,公众舆论被定义为一个或多个团体在特定时间处理一个提出的问题时所共有的主流意见。根据这个定义,民意包括大多数人支持的意见。至于另一种定义,民意是由不同的社区向政府提出的,需要政府考虑的意见。所以,民意是一种政治参与。经过四年的战争,奥斯曼帝国被摧毁,然后共和国成立。在导致帝国灭亡的战败后,加入德国一方参战的责任被归咎于少数行政官员。尤其是恩维尔、西马尔和塔拉特·帕夏对这次溃败负有责任。这些人在决策中处于主导地位,他们的责任是不容否认的。但是,有可能相信仅仅是这些人的决定导致了帝国的终结吗?在德国参战的决定背后,是否有什么民意影响了这些行政官员?如果是,影响公众舆论的因素是什么?战争开始的那个时期的目击者表明,在支持战争的态度方面,行政人员并不孤单。可以说,奥斯曼的舆论总体上是支持战争的。在这方面,一些民族主义组织和团体,如 rk Ocağı(土耳其协会)、Donanma Cemiyeti(舰队协会)、m dafaa-i Milliye Cemiyeti,似乎有效地塑造了公众舆论。随着巴尔干战争的爆发,民族主义宣传的影响越来越大,巴尔干战争所带来的灾难也拉开了穆斯林与非穆斯林之间的鸿沟。事实上,奥斯曼主义在巴尔干战争后失败了,从突厥主义向图尔兰主义扩张的民族主义运动得到了发展。特别是在1914年8月至11月期间,密集进行了伊斯兰主义和泛伊斯兰主义的战争宣传,对当时的年轻一代产生了广泛的影响。在这种情况下,战争被视为合法和必要的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信