Same-Sex and Different-Sex Relationships: Is it Time for Convergence?

J. Carbone
{"title":"Same-Sex and Different-Sex Relationships: Is it Time for Convergence?","authors":"J. Carbone","doi":"10.1017/9781780689319.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two long-term shifts in the family have remade family law in the United States. One involves the fight of same-sex families for recognition. Barred access to marriage and in many jurisdictions to adoption, same-sex couples have fought for the expanded use of contract and newly created statuses to forge families of choice. During the same period, different-sex couples have also forged new types of families as marriage has become optional, and couples age and bear and raise children in the context of more fragile relationships. The courts have responded to these two developments through the use of different doctrines, sometimes extending, for example, domestic partnerships and civil unions solely to partners who could not marry, or sometimes interpreting equitable principles to recognize same-sex partners without a biological tie as parents of a child while addressing the parental standing of traditional step-parents through a different set of legal doctrines. <br> <br>This chapter argues that three developments, in particular, may drive that convergence. The first is the ability of same-sex couples to marry. This raises the issue of whether marriage will become a bright-line marker between committed couples and those in more contingent relationships, particularly in determining parental responsibility at birth. The second involves the continuing role of functional parentage. Will doctrines such as parentage by estoppel, de facto parentage, and psychological parentage that helped same-sex parents gain recognition be extended to stepparents and other different sex partners or will they decline in importance? Third, the chapter considers recognition of more than two legal parents and argues that the key to acknowledging the role of sperm donors, stepparents and other third parties is the creation of statuses that may involve the unequal allocation of parental rights and responsibilities. In all cases, however, evolving family law principles should not depend on the sex of the parties.","PeriodicalId":321451,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Family Law (Sexuality) (Topic)","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Family Law (Sexuality) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780689319.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two long-term shifts in the family have remade family law in the United States. One involves the fight of same-sex families for recognition. Barred access to marriage and in many jurisdictions to adoption, same-sex couples have fought for the expanded use of contract and newly created statuses to forge families of choice. During the same period, different-sex couples have also forged new types of families as marriage has become optional, and couples age and bear and raise children in the context of more fragile relationships. The courts have responded to these two developments through the use of different doctrines, sometimes extending, for example, domestic partnerships and civil unions solely to partners who could not marry, or sometimes interpreting equitable principles to recognize same-sex partners without a biological tie as parents of a child while addressing the parental standing of traditional step-parents through a different set of legal doctrines.

This chapter argues that three developments, in particular, may drive that convergence. The first is the ability of same-sex couples to marry. This raises the issue of whether marriage will become a bright-line marker between committed couples and those in more contingent relationships, particularly in determining parental responsibility at birth. The second involves the continuing role of functional parentage. Will doctrines such as parentage by estoppel, de facto parentage, and psychological parentage that helped same-sex parents gain recognition be extended to stepparents and other different sex partners or will they decline in importance? Third, the chapter considers recognition of more than two legal parents and argues that the key to acknowledging the role of sperm donors, stepparents and other third parties is the creation of statuses that may involve the unequal allocation of parental rights and responsibilities. In all cases, however, evolving family law principles should not depend on the sex of the parties.
同性和异性关系:是趋同的时候了吗?
家庭中的两个长期变化重塑了美国的家庭法。其中一个涉及同性家庭争取认可的斗争。由于在许多司法管辖区禁止结婚和收养,同性伴侣一直在争取扩大使用合同和新设立的地位,以建立选择的家庭。在同一时期,随着婚姻变得可有可无,不同性别的夫妻也形成了新的家庭类型,夫妻在更脆弱的关系中变老、生育和抚养孩子。法院通过使用不同的理论来回应这两种发展,例如,有时将家庭伴侣关系和民事结合只扩展到不能结婚的伴侣,或者有时解释公平原则,承认没有血缘关系的同性伴侣是孩子的父母,同时通过一套不同的法律理论来解决传统继父母的父母地位。本章认为,有三种发展尤其可能推动这种趋同。首先是同性伴侣结婚的权利。这就提出了一个问题:婚姻是否会成为忠诚夫妻和那些关系更加偶然的夫妻之间的一个明确的界限,特别是在确定父母在出生时的责任方面。第二个问题涉及功能性亲子关系的持续作用。禁止反言亲子关系、事实亲子关系、心理亲子关系等帮助同性父母获得认可的理论是否会延伸到继父母和其他不同的性伴侣身上,或者它们的重要性是否会下降?第三,本章考虑了对两个以上合法父母的承认,并认为承认捐精者、继父母和其他第三方角色的关键是创造可能涉及父母权利和责任不平等分配的地位。但是,在所有情况下,不断发展的家庭法原则不应取决于当事人的性别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信