A comparison of Foursquare and Instagram to the study of city dynamics and urban social behavior

Thiago H. Silva, Pedro O. S. Vaz de Melo, J. Almeida, Juliana F. S. Salles, A. Loureiro
{"title":"A comparison of Foursquare and Instagram to the study of city dynamics and urban social behavior","authors":"Thiago H. Silva, Pedro O. S. Vaz de Melo, J. Almeida, Juliana F. S. Salles, A. Loureiro","doi":"10.1145/2505821.2505836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media systems allow a user connected to the Internet to provide useful data about the context in which they are at any given moment, such as Instagram and Foursquare, which are called participatory sensing systems. Location sharing services are examples of participatory sensing systems. The sensed data is a check-in of a particular place that indicates, for instance, a restaurant in a specific location, and also a signal from a user expressing his/her preference. From a participatory sensing system we can derive a participatory sensor network. In this work we compare two different participatory sensor networks, one derived from Instagram, and another one derived from Foursquare. In Instagram, the sensed data is a picture of a specific place. On the other hand, in Foursquare the sensed data is the actual location associated with a specific category of place (e.g., restaurant). Using those social networks we can extract information in many ways. In this work we are interested in comparing two datasets of Foursquare and two datasets of Instagram. We analyze those datasets to investigate whether we can observe the same users' movement pattern, the popularity of regions in cities, the activities of users who use those social networks, and how users share their content along the time. In answering those questions, we want to better understand location-related information, which is an important aspect of the urban phenomena.","PeriodicalId":157169,"journal":{"name":"UrbComp '13","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"88","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UrbComp '13","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2505821.2505836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 88

Abstract

Social media systems allow a user connected to the Internet to provide useful data about the context in which they are at any given moment, such as Instagram and Foursquare, which are called participatory sensing systems. Location sharing services are examples of participatory sensing systems. The sensed data is a check-in of a particular place that indicates, for instance, a restaurant in a specific location, and also a signal from a user expressing his/her preference. From a participatory sensing system we can derive a participatory sensor network. In this work we compare two different participatory sensor networks, one derived from Instagram, and another one derived from Foursquare. In Instagram, the sensed data is a picture of a specific place. On the other hand, in Foursquare the sensed data is the actual location associated with a specific category of place (e.g., restaurant). Using those social networks we can extract information in many ways. In this work we are interested in comparing two datasets of Foursquare and two datasets of Instagram. We analyze those datasets to investigate whether we can observe the same users' movement pattern, the popularity of regions in cities, the activities of users who use those social networks, and how users share their content along the time. In answering those questions, we want to better understand location-related information, which is an important aspect of the urban phenomena.
Foursquare和Instagram对城市动态和城市社会行为研究的比较
社交媒体系统允许连接到互联网的用户在任何给定时刻提供有关他们所处环境的有用数据,例如Instagram和Foursquare,这被称为参与式感知系统。位置共享服务是参与式传感系统的例子。感知到的数据是一个特定地点的签到,例如,在一个特定的位置,一个餐馆,以及一个来自用户表达他/她的偏好的信号。从参与式传感系统中,我们可以得到一个参与式传感网络。在这项工作中,我们比较了两个不同的参与式传感器网络,一个来自Instagram,另一个来自Foursquare。在Instagram上,感知到的数据是一张特定地点的照片。另一方面,在Foursquare中,感知到的数据是与特定类别的地点(例如,餐馆)相关联的实际位置。利用这些社交网络,我们可以以多种方式提取信息。在这项工作中,我们对比较Foursquare的两个数据集和Instagram的两个数据集感兴趣。我们分析这些数据集,以调查我们是否可以观察到相同的用户的移动模式,城市中区域的受欢迎程度,使用这些社交网络的用户的活动,以及用户如何在一段时间内分享他们的内容。在回答这些问题时,我们希望更好地理解与位置相关的信息,这是城市现象的一个重要方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信