REVIEW ARTICLE: Idustrial Relations and the Capitalist Labour Process

J. Brocklesby
{"title":"REVIEW ARTICLE: Idustrial Relations and the Capitalist Labour Process","authors":"J. Brocklesby","doi":"10.26686/NZJIR.V8I3.3550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last 2 decades, there has developed a considerable literature which calls into question many of the taken for granted assumptions of leading scholars. Significantly, the field of industrial relations has not been immune to these investigations, and arguably the most damaging indictments have been served by Hyman (1978), Fox (1973), and Goldthorpe (1974), against the advocates of pluralism, and Wood et al, (1975) against systems theorists. These authors have exposed many of the functionalist assumptions implicit in the mainstream paradigm of industrial relations.","PeriodicalId":365392,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand journal of industrial relations","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand journal of industrial relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/NZJIR.V8I3.3550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

During the last 2 decades, there has developed a considerable literature which calls into question many of the taken for granted assumptions of leading scholars. Significantly, the field of industrial relations has not been immune to these investigations, and arguably the most damaging indictments have been served by Hyman (1978), Fox (1973), and Goldthorpe (1974), against the advocates of pluralism, and Wood et al, (1975) against systems theorists. These authors have exposed many of the functionalist assumptions implicit in the mainstream paradigm of industrial relations.
评论文章:劳资关系和资本主义劳动过程
在过去的二十年里,已经发展了相当多的文献,这些文献对许多主要学者认为理所当然的假设提出了质疑。值得注意的是,劳资关系领域也未能免受这些调查的影响,可以说最具破坏性的指控是由海曼(1978)、福克斯(1973)和戈德索普(1974)提出的,他们反对多元主义的倡导者,伍德等人(1975)反对系统理论家。这些作者揭露了许多隐含在工业关系主流范式中的功能主义假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信