‘Verbs’ in Thesis and Journal-Article Introductions: A Comparative Functional Approach

M. Manar, R. Dewanti
{"title":"‘Verbs’ in Thesis and Journal-Article Introductions: A Comparative Functional Approach","authors":"M. Manar, R. Dewanti","doi":"10.32996/ijls.2023.3.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This transitivity study aims to delineate the ‘verbs’ employed in the introduction sections of students’ English-major theses (IST) in reference to those of the introduction sections of research articles (ISRA) published by TESOL journal. To obtain this purpose, ten introduction sections from ISRA were analysed as the parameter, and 10 from its IST counterparts were evaluated. Both data sets were initially scrutinized for their categorization of process types. Then the analysis was followed by the categorization of specific processes in each process type. All data analysis was executed by employing the tables of analysis adapted from the transitivity framework of Halliday and Matthiessen. The transitivity analysis reveals that compared with the data of TESOL journal, the meaning making in the IST is inclined to be represented by less investigative processes of material, verbal, and mental clauses. Some less investigative processes are reflected from the verbs ‘use’, ’want’, ‘say’, etc., while the knowledge building processes in the ISRA are shown by more investigative processes such as ‘investigate’, ‘find’, ‘question’,  etc. Overall, in reference to the clauses in the research articles (RA) of TESOL journal, the ones in the introduction sections of students’ undergraduate theses still lack processes for supporting the basis of knowledge building. It is expected that the findings of this study contribute to the field of academic writing, that is, to give insight to student thesis writers into how to make meaning of their introduction functionally.","PeriodicalId":188874,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Linguistics Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Linguistics Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/ijls.2023.3.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This transitivity study aims to delineate the ‘verbs’ employed in the introduction sections of students’ English-major theses (IST) in reference to those of the introduction sections of research articles (ISRA) published by TESOL journal. To obtain this purpose, ten introduction sections from ISRA were analysed as the parameter, and 10 from its IST counterparts were evaluated. Both data sets were initially scrutinized for their categorization of process types. Then the analysis was followed by the categorization of specific processes in each process type. All data analysis was executed by employing the tables of analysis adapted from the transitivity framework of Halliday and Matthiessen. The transitivity analysis reveals that compared with the data of TESOL journal, the meaning making in the IST is inclined to be represented by less investigative processes of material, verbal, and mental clauses. Some less investigative processes are reflected from the verbs ‘use’, ’want’, ‘say’, etc., while the knowledge building processes in the ISRA are shown by more investigative processes such as ‘investigate’, ‘find’, ‘question’,  etc. Overall, in reference to the clauses in the research articles (RA) of TESOL journal, the ones in the introduction sections of students’ undergraduate theses still lack processes for supporting the basis of knowledge building. It is expected that the findings of this study contribute to the field of academic writing, that is, to give insight to student thesis writers into how to make meaning of their introduction functionally.
论文和期刊文章导言中的“动词”:比较功能分析
本文的及物性研究旨在参照《TESOL》期刊上发表的研究性文章(ISRA)的介绍部分,描述学生英语专业论文(IST)中使用的“动词”。为了达到这个目的,我们分析了来自ISRA的10个引言章节作为参数,并评估了来自IST的10个引言章节。最初对这两个数据集进行了仔细检查,以确定它们对过程类型的分类。然后进行分析,对每个过程类型中的具体过程进行分类。所有的数据分析都采用了从Halliday和Matthiessen的及物性框架改编的分析表。及物性分析表明,与TESOL期刊的数据相比,科技期刊的意义生成倾向于较少的材料、言语和心理从句的研究性过程。一些较少的调查性过程反映在动词“use”、“want”、“say”等上,而ISRA中的知识构建过程则表现在更多的调查性过程中,如“investigate”、“find”、“question”等。总体而言,相对于TESOL期刊研究论文(RA)中的条款,大学生本科毕业论文导论部分的条款仍然缺乏支撑知识构建基础的流程。期望本研究的发现对学术写作领域有所贡献,即为学生论文作者提供见解,以了解如何在功能上使其介绍具有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信