Evaluation of results of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures. A study involving 40 patients

A. Sharma, Gourav Sharma, Vinaydeep Bidoliya, Kirtiraj Nagina
{"title":"Evaluation of results of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures. A study involving 40 patients","authors":"A. Sharma, Gourav Sharma, Vinaydeep Bidoliya, Kirtiraj Nagina","doi":"10.17511/IJOSO.2020.I01.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Fracture of humeral shaft account for roughly 3% of all fractures. Previously, non-operative treatment has been accepted modality of treatment. Three main operative techniques are in vogue for treating displaced humeral shaft fractures namely intramedullary nailing, conventional plating osteosynthesis (CPO) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO). \nMaterial and Methods: 40 fractures of humerus shaft were treated with MIPO technique, in a prospective study between December 2015 and September 2017 at our institute. The cases were followed up for a minimum period of 2 years. \nResults: The average age was 41 years (23-71 years). Twenty-three (57.5%) were males and 17 (42.5 %) females. Twenty-nine cases (72.5%) had injury in their dominant arm. The mean surgical time was 45.5 minutes and the mean radiation exposure was for 85.3 seconds. The mean follow-up of our cases was 33 months. \nConclusion: MIPO is a better choice for treating humeral shaft fractures than CPO, though there is no significant difference between MIPO and CPO in terms of operative time, fracture union rate, and fracture union time.","PeriodicalId":267909,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17511/IJOSO.2020.I01.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fracture of humeral shaft account for roughly 3% of all fractures. Previously, non-operative treatment has been accepted modality of treatment. Three main operative techniques are in vogue for treating displaced humeral shaft fractures namely intramedullary nailing, conventional plating osteosynthesis (CPO) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO). Material and Methods: 40 fractures of humerus shaft were treated with MIPO technique, in a prospective study between December 2015 and September 2017 at our institute. The cases were followed up for a minimum period of 2 years. Results: The average age was 41 years (23-71 years). Twenty-three (57.5%) were males and 17 (42.5 %) females. Twenty-nine cases (72.5%) had injury in their dominant arm. The mean surgical time was 45.5 minutes and the mean radiation exposure was for 85.3 seconds. The mean follow-up of our cases was 33 months. Conclusion: MIPO is a better choice for treating humeral shaft fractures than CPO, though there is no significant difference between MIPO and CPO in terms of operative time, fracture union rate, and fracture union time.
微创钢板内固定治疗肱骨骨干骨折的效果评价。一项涉及40名患者的研究
肱骨干骨折约占所有骨折的3%。以前,非手术治疗是公认的治疗方式。目前治疗肱骨移位骨折的主要手术技术有髓内钉、常规钢板内固定(CPO)和微创钢板内固定(MIPO)三种。材料与方法:2015年12月至2017年9月在我院进行了一项前瞻性研究,采用MIPO技术治疗40例肱骨干骨折。这些病例的随访时间至少为2年。结果:平均年龄41岁(23 ~ 71岁)。男性23例(57.5%),女性17例(42.5%)。主臂损伤29例(72.5%)。平均手术时间为45.5分钟,平均辐射暴露时间为85.3秒。我们病例的平均随访时间为33个月。结论:MIPO与CPO在手术时间、骨折愈合率、骨折愈合时间等方面无显著差异,但MIPO是治疗肱骨干骨折较CPO更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信