Buying Consumption Smoothing: Saving for the Future by Buying Ahead

J. Collins, Amrita Kulka
{"title":"Buying Consumption Smoothing: Saving for the Future by Buying Ahead","authors":"J. Collins, Amrita Kulka","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3713394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study considers an under-explored channel through which credit-constrained house- holds may smooth consumption – buying ahead. We employ a differences-in-differences-in- differences strategy and exploit variation from state tax laws introduced in different states in different years. Using toilet paper as an example of a widely bought, necessary and storable product, we compare how households’ purchasing behavior changes in response to transitory income from tax refunds. We find that households increase the amount of toilet paper purchased by around 20% in response to a state income tax refund, but do not increase the purchased quantity of perishables. The inter-purchase time for toilet paper also increases, ruling out that households are simply increasing consumption in response to more income. Finally, households increase expenditures on toilet paper only by 11%, indicating that they are saving per unit by buying in larger quantities. Buying ahead appears to allow households to smooth consumption by purchasing a stockpile of non-perishable, necessary goods that they can slowly consume over time.","PeriodicalId":176300,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3713394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study considers an under-explored channel through which credit-constrained house- holds may smooth consumption – buying ahead. We employ a differences-in-differences-in- differences strategy and exploit variation from state tax laws introduced in different states in different years. Using toilet paper as an example of a widely bought, necessary and storable product, we compare how households’ purchasing behavior changes in response to transitory income from tax refunds. We find that households increase the amount of toilet paper purchased by around 20% in response to a state income tax refund, but do not increase the purchased quantity of perishables. The inter-purchase time for toilet paper also increases, ruling out that households are simply increasing consumption in response to more income. Finally, households increase expenditures on toilet paper only by 11%, indicating that they are saving per unit by buying in larger quantities. Buying ahead appears to allow households to smooth consumption by purchasing a stockpile of non-perishable, necessary goods that they can slowly consume over time.
购买消费平滑:通过提前购买为未来储蓄
这项研究考虑了一个尚未开发的渠道,通过这个渠道,信贷受限的家庭可能会顺利进行消费购买。我们采用差异中差异中差异的策略,并利用不同年份不同州引入的州税法的差异。以厕纸为例,我们比较了家庭的购买行为是如何随着退税带来的暂时性收入而变化的。我们发现,作为对国家所得税退税的回应,家庭增加了约20%的卫生纸购买量,但没有增加易腐品的购买量。卫生纸的购买间隔时间也增加了,这就排除了家庭只是因为收入增加而增加消费的可能性。最后,家庭在卫生纸上的支出只增加了11%,这表明他们通过大量购买每单位卫生纸而节省了开支。提前购买似乎可以让家庭平稳消费,因为他们购买了一些不易腐烂的必需品,可以随着时间的推移慢慢消费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信