(Arbitrary) Partial Communication

R. Galimullin, Fernando R. Vel'azquez-Quesada
{"title":"(Arbitrary) Partial Communication","authors":"R. Galimullin, Fernando R. Vel'azquez-Quesada","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2302.12090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Communication within groups of agents has been lately the focus of research in dynamic epistemic logic (DEL). This paper studies a recently introduced form of partial (more precisely, topic-based) communication. This type of communication allows for modelling scenarios of multi-agent collaboration and negotiation, and it is particularly well-suited for situations in which sharing all information is not feasible/advisable. After presenting results on invariance and complexity of model checking, the paper compares partial communication to public announcements, probably the most well-known type of communication in DEL. It is shown that the settings are, update-wise, incomparable: there are scenarios in which the effect of a public announcement cannot be replicated by partial communication, and vice versa. Then, the paper shifts its attention to strategic topic-based communication. It does so by extending the language with a modality that quantifies over the topics the agents can `talk about'. For this new framework, it provides a complete axiomatisation, showing also that the new language's model checking problem is PSPACE-complete. The paper closes showing that, in terms of expressivity, this new language of arbitrary partial communication is incomparable to that of arbitrary public announcements.","PeriodicalId":326727,"journal":{"name":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.12090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Communication within groups of agents has been lately the focus of research in dynamic epistemic logic (DEL). This paper studies a recently introduced form of partial (more precisely, topic-based) communication. This type of communication allows for modelling scenarios of multi-agent collaboration and negotiation, and it is particularly well-suited for situations in which sharing all information is not feasible/advisable. After presenting results on invariance and complexity of model checking, the paper compares partial communication to public announcements, probably the most well-known type of communication in DEL. It is shown that the settings are, update-wise, incomparable: there are scenarios in which the effect of a public announcement cannot be replicated by partial communication, and vice versa. Then, the paper shifts its attention to strategic topic-based communication. It does so by extending the language with a modality that quantifies over the topics the agents can `talk about'. For this new framework, it provides a complete axiomatisation, showing also that the new language's model checking problem is PSPACE-complete. The paper closes showing that, in terms of expressivity, this new language of arbitrary partial communication is incomparable to that of arbitrary public announcements.
(任意)部分通信
动态认知逻辑(dynamic epistemic logic, DEL)是近年来智能体群体间的通信问题研究的热点。本文研究了最近引入的部分(更准确地说是基于主题的)通信形式。这种类型的通信允许建模多代理协作和协商的场景,它特别适合于共享所有信息不可行/不可取的情况。在给出了模型检查的不变性和复杂性的结果之后,本文将部分通信与公告进行了比较,公告可能是DEL中最著名的通信类型。结果表明,这些设置在更新方面是不可比拟的:在某些情况下,公开通知的效果无法通过部分通信复制,反之亦然。然后,本文将注意力转移到战略话题传播。它通过使用一种情态来扩展语言,这种情态可以量化代理可以“谈论”的主题。对于这个新框架,它提供了一个完整的公理化,也表明了新语言的模型检查问题是pspace完备的。论文最后表明,就表达能力而言,这种任意部分交流的新语言是任意公告无法比拟的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信