Comprehensive pertinence in the quality assessment of higher education / La pertinencia integral en la evaluación de la calidad de la educación superior

Antonio Cardona-Rodríguez, Koldo Unceta-Satrústegui, Marta Barandiaran-Galdós
{"title":"Comprehensive pertinence in the quality assessment of higher education / La pertinencia integral en la evaluación de la calidad de la educación superior","authors":"Antonio Cardona-Rodríguez, Koldo Unceta-Satrústegui, Marta Barandiaran-Galdós","doi":"10.1080/11356405.2016.1158446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper is based on the current debate concerning the criteria for quality assessment of higher education in a knowledge society, focusing attention on its pertinence. It is approached from dualities in the university task of producing and transmitting knowledge that intervenes in the analysis of the pertinence criteria for evaluating quality: knowledge use value versus exchange value, or market rules versus other social agents’ demands. The need for a comprehensive pertinence defined by two dimensions, internal and external, is justified.","PeriodicalId":153832,"journal":{"name":"Cultura y Educación","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultura y Educación","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2016.1158446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract This paper is based on the current debate concerning the criteria for quality assessment of higher education in a knowledge society, focusing attention on its pertinence. It is approached from dualities in the university task of producing and transmitting knowledge that intervenes in the analysis of the pertinence criteria for evaluating quality: knowledge use value versus exchange value, or market rules versus other social agents’ demands. The need for a comprehensive pertinence defined by two dimensions, internal and external, is justified.
高等教育质量评估的综合相关性/高等教育质量评估的综合相关性
摘要本文以知识社会中高等教育质量评价标准的争论为基础,着重探讨其针对性。它是从生产和传播知识的大学任务的二元性切入的,这介入了对评价质量的针对性标准的分析:知识使用价值与交换价值,或者市场规则与其他社会代理人的需求。需要一个由内部和外部两个维度定义的全面针对性是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信