Accurate wild animal recognition using PCA, LDA and LBPH

P. Kamencay, Tibor Trnovszký, M. Benco, R. Hudec, P. Sykora, Andrej Satnik
{"title":"Accurate wild animal recognition using PCA, LDA and LBPH","authors":"P. Kamencay, Tibor Trnovszký, M. Benco, R. Hudec, P. Sykora, Andrej Satnik","doi":"10.1109/ELEKTRO.2016.7512036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the performances of image recognition methods such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Local Binary Patterns Histograms (LBPH) are tested and compared for the image recognition of the input animal images. The main idea of this paper is to present an independent, comparative study and some of the benefits and drawbacks of these most popular image recognition methods. Two sets of experiments are conducted for relative performance evaluations. In the first part of our experiments, the recognition accuracy of PCA, LDA and LBPH is demonstrated. The overall time execution for animal recognition process is evaluated in the second set of our experiments. We conduct tests on created animal database. The all algorithms have been tested on 300 different subjects (60 images for each class). The experimental result shows that the PCA features provide better results as LDA and LBPH for large training set. On the other hand, LBPH is better than PCA and LDA for small training data set.","PeriodicalId":369251,"journal":{"name":"2016 ELEKTRO","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 ELEKTRO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELEKTRO.2016.7512036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

In this paper, the performances of image recognition methods such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Local Binary Patterns Histograms (LBPH) are tested and compared for the image recognition of the input animal images. The main idea of this paper is to present an independent, comparative study and some of the benefits and drawbacks of these most popular image recognition methods. Two sets of experiments are conducted for relative performance evaluations. In the first part of our experiments, the recognition accuracy of PCA, LDA and LBPH is demonstrated. The overall time execution for animal recognition process is evaluated in the second set of our experiments. We conduct tests on created animal database. The all algorithms have been tested on 300 different subjects (60 images for each class). The experimental result shows that the PCA features provide better results as LDA and LBPH for large training set. On the other hand, LBPH is better than PCA and LDA for small training data set.
基于PCA、LDA和LBPH的野生动物准确识别
本文对主成分分析(PCA)、线性判别分析(LDA)和局部二值模式直方图(LBPH)等图像识别方法在输入动物图像识别中的性能进行了测试和比较。本文的主要思想是对这些最流行的图像识别方法进行独立的比较研究和一些优点和缺点。进行了两组实验,进行了相对的性能评价。在第一部分的实验中,我们验证了PCA、LDA和LBPH的识别精度。在第二组实验中,我们评估了动物识别过程的总体执行时间。我们在创建的动物数据库上进行测试。所有的算法都在300个不同的科目上进行了测试(每个类别60张图片)。实验结果表明,PCA特征与LDA和LBPH相比,对于大型训练集具有更好的效果。另一方面,对于较小的训练数据集,LBPH优于PCA和LDA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信