Comparison of retention of two proximal sealants in mandibular first molars of 12-year-old school children - A split-mouth randomized trial

B. Sankar, M. Kumar
{"title":"Comparison of retention of two proximal sealants in mandibular first molars of 12-year-old school children - A split-mouth randomized trial","authors":"B. Sankar, M. Kumar","doi":"10.25259/JGOH-1-1-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThis study was done to assess and compare the retention properties of a proximal sealant made of polyurethane dimethacrylate and a resin-based adhesive system for sealing proximal surfaces of permanent mandibular first molars in 12-year-old children over a period of 6 months.\n\n\n\nA split-mouth randomized trial was conducted among 50 school children. Pre-operative and post-operative bitewing radiographs were taken bilaterally prior at baseline and the end of the sixth month. Separators were placed for those children who did not have physiological spacing. The interventions were delivered on the left and right sides after randomization as per the manufacturer’s instructions, and post-operative instructions were given to the participants. The interventions were assessed for retention primarily and other criteria such as color match, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, anatomic form, caries formation (using bitewing radiographs), post-operative sensitivity, and surface roughness at the end of the 1st, 3rd, and 6 months using United States Public Health Service Modified Ryge Criteria for Direct Clinical Evaluation of Restorations proposed by Cvar and Ryge, 1980. The data were compiled, analyzed using SPSS and results were generated.\n\n\n\nThe study results revealed that the resin-based adhesive system was better than the adhesive patch in terms of retention over a period of 6 months. Hence, the feasibility of including proximal sealants as a part of the preventive regimen for caries risk children should be positively considered.\n","PeriodicalId":441224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Oral Health","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JGOH-1-1-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was done to assess and compare the retention properties of a proximal sealant made of polyurethane dimethacrylate and a resin-based adhesive system for sealing proximal surfaces of permanent mandibular first molars in 12-year-old children over a period of 6 months. A split-mouth randomized trial was conducted among 50 school children. Pre-operative and post-operative bitewing radiographs were taken bilaterally prior at baseline and the end of the sixth month. Separators were placed for those children who did not have physiological spacing. The interventions were delivered on the left and right sides after randomization as per the manufacturer’s instructions, and post-operative instructions were given to the participants. The interventions were assessed for retention primarily and other criteria such as color match, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, anatomic form, caries formation (using bitewing radiographs), post-operative sensitivity, and surface roughness at the end of the 1st, 3rd, and 6 months using United States Public Health Service Modified Ryge Criteria for Direct Clinical Evaluation of Restorations proposed by Cvar and Ryge, 1980. The data were compiled, analyzed using SPSS and results were generated. The study results revealed that the resin-based adhesive system was better than the adhesive patch in terms of retention over a period of 6 months. Hence, the feasibility of including proximal sealants as a part of the preventive regimen for caries risk children should be positively considered.
两种近端密封剂在12岁学龄儿童下颌第一磨牙固位的比较-一项裂口随机试验
本研究在6个月的时间里,对12岁儿童固定下颌第一磨牙近端表面密封用聚亚胺二甲基丙烯酸酯制成的近端密封胶和树脂基粘合系统的固位性能进行了评估和比较。在50名学童中进行了一项裂口随机试验。术前和术后分别在基线和第六个月末拍摄双侧咬颌片。为那些没有生理间隔的孩子放置了隔板。根据制造商的说明随机化后,在左侧和右侧进行干预,并向参与者提供术后指导。根据Cvar和Ryge 1980年提出的美国公共卫生服务直接临床评价标准,评估干预措施的主要保留度和其他标准,如颜色匹配、边缘变色、边缘适应、解剖形态、龋齿形成(使用咬翼x线片)、术后敏感性和表面粗糙度。对数据进行整理,用SPSS软件进行分析,得出结果。研究结果表明,在6个月的保留时间内,树脂基胶粘剂系统优于胶粘剂贴片。因此,应积极考虑将近端密封剂作为预防龋齿风险儿童方案的一部分的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信