The European Constitutional Settlement

A. Moravcsik
{"title":"The European Constitutional Settlement","authors":"A. Moravcsik","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01086.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues first that a synthesis of the theories of endogenous policy formation, non-coercive interstate bargaining theory, and international regime theory provides a plausible account of the path of European integration, with little role for explanations stressing geopolitical or ideological factors, international mediation, or political entrepreneurship. Moreover, these theories - which embrace economic fundamentals as driving factors - help explain the 'sequencing' of the European Union, especially in regard to successive enlargements. However, the paper concludes that the process of European integration appears to have reached an 'institutional plateau', for which incremental change based on the current 'constitutional compromise' appears to be the only plausible equilibrium. Copyright 2008 The Author.","PeriodicalId":326599,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Europe & Eurasia (Comparative) (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"62","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Europe & Eurasia (Comparative) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01086.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

Abstract

This paper argues first that a synthesis of the theories of endogenous policy formation, non-coercive interstate bargaining theory, and international regime theory provides a plausible account of the path of European integration, with little role for explanations stressing geopolitical or ideological factors, international mediation, or political entrepreneurship. Moreover, these theories - which embrace economic fundamentals as driving factors - help explain the 'sequencing' of the European Union, especially in regard to successive enlargements. However, the paper concludes that the process of European integration appears to have reached an 'institutional plateau', for which incremental change based on the current 'constitutional compromise' appears to be the only plausible equilibrium. Copyright 2008 The Author.
欧洲宪法解决方案
本文首先认为,内生政策形成理论、非强制性州际谈判理论和国际制度理论的综合为欧洲一体化的路径提供了一个合理的解释,而强调地缘政治或意识形态因素、国际调解或政治企业家精神的解释几乎没有作用。此外,这些将经济基本面作为驱动因素的理论有助于解释欧盟的“顺序”,特别是在连续扩大方面。然而,本文得出的结论是,欧洲一体化的进程似乎已经达到了一个“制度平台”,基于当前“宪法妥协”的渐进式变化似乎是唯一合理的平衡。版权所有2008作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信