Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications

S. S. Yasiran, A. K. Jumaat, M. Manaf, A. Ibrahim, W.A.R Wan Eny Zarina, A. Malek, Mohamed Faris Laham, R. Mahmud
{"title":"Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications","authors":"S. S. Yasiran, A. K. Jumaat, M. Manaf, A. Ibrahim, W.A.R Wan Eny Zarina, A. Malek, Mohamed Faris Laham, R. Mahmud","doi":"10.1109/ICCAIE.2011.6162204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Snake, active contour or deformable active contour has been widely used in medical image segmentation area. In this paper, comparison between Gradient Vector Flow (GVF) snake and Enhanced Distance (ED) snake in segmenting microcalcifications is carried out. The performance is measured based on actual area of the average percentage difference traced by expert radiologists. Results obtained shows that the values of average percentage difference for the GVF and ED snake are 4.3% and 6.68% respectively. These results indicate that the GVF snake has better performance with 95.7%.","PeriodicalId":132155,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics (ICCAIE)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics (ICCAIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAIE.2011.6162204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Snake, active contour or deformable active contour has been widely used in medical image segmentation area. In this paper, comparison between Gradient Vector Flow (GVF) snake and Enhanced Distance (ED) snake in segmenting microcalcifications is carried out. The performance is measured based on actual area of the average percentage difference traced by expert radiologists. Results obtained shows that the values of average percentage difference for the GVF and ED snake are 4.3% and 6.68% respectively. These results indicate that the GVF snake has better performance with 95.7%.
GVF蛇与ED蛇分割微钙化的比较
蛇形、活动轮廓或可变形活动轮廓已广泛应用于医学图像分割领域。本文对梯度矢量流(GVF)蛇形与增强距离(ED)蛇形在微钙化分割中的应用进行了比较。性能是根据专家放射科医生追踪的平均百分比差异的实际面积来衡量的。结果表明,GVF和ED蛇的平均百分比差值分别为4.3%和6.68%。结果表明,GVF蛇的性能较好,达到95.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信