An industrial case study of implementing and validating defect classification for process improvement and quality management

B. Freimut, C. Denger, M. Ketterer
{"title":"An industrial case study of implementing and validating defect classification for process improvement and quality management","authors":"B. Freimut, C. Denger, M. Ketterer","doi":"10.1109/METRICS.2005.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defect measurement plays a crucial role when assessing quality assurance processes such as inspections and testing. To systematically combine these processes in the context of an integrated quality assurance strategy, measurement must provide empirical evidence on how effective these processes are and which types of defects are detected by which quality assurance process. Typically, defect classification schemes, such as ODC or the Hewlett-Packard scheme, are used to measure defects for this purpose. However, we found it difficult to transfer existing schemes to an embedded software context, where specific document- and defect types have to be considered. This paper presents an approach to define, introduce, and validate a customized defect classification scheme that considers the specifics of an industrial environment. The core of the approach is to combine the software engineering know-how of measurement experts and the domain know-how of developers. In addition to the approach, we present the results and experiences of using the approach in an industrial setting. The results indicate that our approach results in a defect classification scheme that allows classifying defects with good reliability, that allows identifying process improvement actions, and that can serve as a baseline for evaluating the impact of process improvements","PeriodicalId":402415,"journal":{"name":"11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'05)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"67","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/METRICS.2005.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

Abstract

Defect measurement plays a crucial role when assessing quality assurance processes such as inspections and testing. To systematically combine these processes in the context of an integrated quality assurance strategy, measurement must provide empirical evidence on how effective these processes are and which types of defects are detected by which quality assurance process. Typically, defect classification schemes, such as ODC or the Hewlett-Packard scheme, are used to measure defects for this purpose. However, we found it difficult to transfer existing schemes to an embedded software context, where specific document- and defect types have to be considered. This paper presents an approach to define, introduce, and validate a customized defect classification scheme that considers the specifics of an industrial environment. The core of the approach is to combine the software engineering know-how of measurement experts and the domain know-how of developers. In addition to the approach, we present the results and experiences of using the approach in an industrial setting. The results indicate that our approach results in a defect classification scheme that allows classifying defects with good reliability, that allows identifying process improvement actions, and that can serve as a baseline for evaluating the impact of process improvements
一个为过程改进和质量管理实施和验证缺陷分类的工业案例研究
在评估质量保证过程(如检查和测试)时,缺陷度量起着至关重要的作用。为了在集成质量保证策略的上下文中系统地结合这些过程,度量必须提供经验证据,证明这些过程是多么有效,以及哪个质量保证过程检测到哪些类型的缺陷。通常,缺陷分类方案,如ODC或Hewlett-Packard方案,用于为此目的度量缺陷。然而,我们发现很难将现有的方案转移到嵌入式软件环境中,其中必须考虑特定的文档和缺陷类型。本文提出了一种方法来定义、引入和验证考虑工业环境细节的定制缺陷分类方案。该方法的核心是将测量专家的软件工程知识和开发人员的领域知识结合起来。除了该方法之外,我们还介绍了在工业环境中使用该方法的结果和经验。结果表明,我们的方法产生了一个缺陷分类方案,该方案允许对具有良好可靠性的缺陷进行分类,允许识别过程改进行动,并且可以作为评估过程改进影响的基线
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信