Integrated Academic Information System Based on The Perception of Ease And Benefits

E. Firmansyah, Muhammad Agreindra Helmiawan, Irfan Fadil, Fathoni Mahardika, D. Budiana, Reny Rian Marliana
{"title":"Integrated Academic Information System Based on The Perception of Ease And Benefits","authors":"E. Firmansyah, Muhammad Agreindra Helmiawan, Irfan Fadil, Fathoni Mahardika, D. Budiana, Reny Rian Marliana","doi":"10.1109/CITSM56380.2022.9935832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current management of higher education cannot be separated from an information system, one of which is an academic information system. Along with the many accesses from various devices, there are obstacles in the form of an unresponsive interface when accessed on a mobile display. The purpose of this study is to assess the user interface of an integrated academic information system in increasing the comfort of the system from the user's point of view. Technology Acceptance Model is a method that can be used to measure user perceptions of the ease and usability of the system. In other words, this research is to assess users' willingness to accept useful facilities and make it easier for users, both in terms of function and appearance. Overall, the academic information system assessment variable is considered good by users, namely, the ease of use factor is worth 1900 smaller than the usefulness factor which is worth 2033, but some indicators have a small total score below 300. Therefore, it is necessary to measure the other criteria in identifying user wants and needs as a whole.","PeriodicalId":342813,"journal":{"name":"2022 10th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 10th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM56380.2022.9935832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current management of higher education cannot be separated from an information system, one of which is an academic information system. Along with the many accesses from various devices, there are obstacles in the form of an unresponsive interface when accessed on a mobile display. The purpose of this study is to assess the user interface of an integrated academic information system in increasing the comfort of the system from the user's point of view. Technology Acceptance Model is a method that can be used to measure user perceptions of the ease and usability of the system. In other words, this research is to assess users' willingness to accept useful facilities and make it easier for users, both in terms of function and appearance. Overall, the academic information system assessment variable is considered good by users, namely, the ease of use factor is worth 1900 smaller than the usefulness factor which is worth 2033, but some indicators have a small total score below 300. Therefore, it is necessary to measure the other criteria in identifying user wants and needs as a whole.
基于便捷与利益感知的综合学术信息系统
当前的高等教育管理离不开信息系统,其中之一就是学术信息系统。随着来自各种设备的许多访问,当在移动显示器上访问时,存在以无响应界面形式出现的障碍。本研究的目的是评估一个综合学术资讯系统的使用者介面,从使用者的角度来增加系统的舒适度。技术接受模型是一种方法,可以用来衡量用户对系统的易用性和可用性的看法。换句话说,这项研究是为了评估用户是否愿意接受有用的设施,并在功能和外观上让用户更容易使用。总体而言,用户认为学术信息系统评价变量较好,即易用性因子比有用性因子小1900,有用性因子小2033,但部分指标总分低于300。因此,有必要衡量其他标准,以确定用户的需求和需求作为一个整体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信