A Comparison of Process Ontology Discovery from Organizational Guidelines in Two Different Languages

Ozge Gurbuz, Onur Demirörs
{"title":"A Comparison of Process Ontology Discovery from Organizational Guidelines in Two Different Languages","authors":"Ozge Gurbuz, Onur Demirörs","doi":"10.1109/SEAA.2017.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Process ontologies contain organization's process elements which are related to the business activities, in a structured format. Once organizations establish process ontologies, searching process information as well as discovery, modeling and automation become more efficient. Process ontologies are frequently developed from organizational resources such as guidelines, regulations and procedures by interpreting the document, discovering the process information and building the ontology. The studies depict that the development of process ontologies can be partially automated. However, a significant success factor in this automation is the language of the document and the tools available to interpret the written text in a given language. In this study, we conducted an exploratory case study in order to analyze the potential of process ontology discovery in different languages. We applied the process ontology discovery method we have developed for guidelines written in English and Turkish and compared the success rates. We also discuss the requirements for process discovery automation.","PeriodicalId":151513,"journal":{"name":"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":"79 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2017.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Process ontologies contain organization's process elements which are related to the business activities, in a structured format. Once organizations establish process ontologies, searching process information as well as discovery, modeling and automation become more efficient. Process ontologies are frequently developed from organizational resources such as guidelines, regulations and procedures by interpreting the document, discovering the process information and building the ontology. The studies depict that the development of process ontologies can be partially automated. However, a significant success factor in this automation is the language of the document and the tools available to interpret the written text in a given language. In this study, we conducted an exploratory case study in order to analyze the potential of process ontology discovery in different languages. We applied the process ontology discovery method we have developed for guidelines written in English and Turkish and compared the success rates. We also discuss the requirements for process discovery automation.
两种语言组织指南过程本体发现的比较
流程本体以结构化格式包含与业务活动相关的组织流程元素。一旦组织建立了过程本体,搜索过程信息以及发现、建模和自动化将变得更加有效。过程本体通常是通过解释文档、发现过程信息和构建本体,从指导方针、法规和过程等组织资源中开发出来的。研究表明,过程本体的开发可以部分自动化。然而,这种自动化的一个重要成功因素是文档的语言和可用来解释给定语言的书面文本的工具。在本研究中,我们进行了一个探索性案例研究,以分析在不同语言中发现过程本体的潜力。我们应用了我们为英语和土耳其语编写的指南开发的过程本体发现方法,并比较了成功率。我们还讨论了过程发现自动化的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信